vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of American Express (AXP) and HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (HASI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($114.8M vs $18.9M, roughly 6.1× American Express). American Express runs the higher net margin — 15.7% vs -46.8%, a 62.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.3% vs 11.4%). Over the past eight quarters, HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (4.2% CAGR vs -95.6%).
American Express Company, together with its subsidiaries, provides charge and credit payment card products, and travel-related services worldwide. The company operates through three segments: Global Consumer Services Group, Global Commercial Services, and Global Merchant and Network Services. Its products and services include payment and financing products; network services; accounts payable expense management products and services; and travel and lifestyle services. The company's products an...
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (HASI) is a specialized investment firm focused on sustainable infrastructure assets covering renewable energy, energy efficiency, sustainable real estate and low-carbon utility segments. It primarily operates in North American markets, providing long-term capital to eligible sustainable projects and delivering stable risk-adjusted returns to investors through recurring cash flows from operational underlying assets.
AXP vs HASI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 2026 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.9M | $114.8M |
| Net Profit | $3.0M | $-53.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -57.4% |
| Net Margin | 15.7% | -46.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.4% | 13.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.0% | -176.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $18.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.9B | $114.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.4B | $103.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.3B | $85.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6B | $96.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $101.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.7B | $82.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.8B | $94.5M |
| Q1 26 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $-53.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $83.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $98.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $56.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $70.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $-19.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $26.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.2% | -57.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.6% | 84.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.7% | 90.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.0% | -32.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.6% | 39.5% |
| Q1 26 | 15.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.5% | -46.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.9% | 80.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.0% | 114.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.8% | 58.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.8% | 69.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.8% | -23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.7% | 28.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.52 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.14 | $0.61 | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.08 | $0.74 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.64 | $0.44 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.04 | $0.58 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.49 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.15 | $0.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $110.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $60.4M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $34.0M | $2.7B |
| Total Assets | $308.9M | $8.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.78× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $742.0M | $110.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $301.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $197.0M | $86.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $261.0M | $67.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $221.0M | $129.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $120.0M | $44.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $188.0M | $145.7M |
| Q1 26 | $60.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $56.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $53.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | $34.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $33.5B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.3B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.5B | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | $308.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $300.1B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $297.6B | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $295.6B | $7.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $282.2B | $7.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $271.5B | $7.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $271.0B | $6.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $272.2B | $6.7B |
| Q1 26 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.68× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.80× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.64× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.64× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.80× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.74× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $246.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | $246.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | $-121.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | $79.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $-37.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | $-12.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.8B | $21.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5B | $-24.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -23.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.25× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.15× | -1.46× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.51× | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.84× | -0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.66× | -0.17× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.72× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.50× | -0.94× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AXP
| Discount revenue | $9.5M | 50% |
| Other | $8.9M | 47% |
| Deposits with banks and other | $512.0K | 3% |
HASI
Segment breakdown not available.
