vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Azenta, Inc. (AZTA) and FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORP (FCF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Azenta, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($148.6M vs $133.7M, roughly 1.1× FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORP). FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 28.1% vs -10.4%, a 38.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.0% vs 0.8%). Over the past eight quarters, FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (5.5% CAGR vs 4.4%).
Azenta, was founded in 1978, and is based in Chelmsford, Massachusetts, United States. The company is a provider of life sciences services including genomics, cryogenic storage, automation, and informatics.
First Commonwealth Financial Corp is a Pennsylvania-based regional financial services holding company. It offers consumer and commercial banking products, loans, wealth management, and insurance services for individuals, small and mid-sized enterprises across central and western Pennsylvania and Ohio.
AZTA vs FCF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $148.6M | $133.7M |
| Net Profit | $-15.4M | $37.5M |
| Gross Margin | 42.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -4.9% | — |
| Net Margin | -10.4% | 28.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.8% | 13.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -15.7% | 14.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.34 | $0.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $133.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $148.6M | $137.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $159.2M | $136.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.9M | $131.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $143.3M | $118.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $147.4M | $120.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $150.6M | $121.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $144.3M | $120.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $37.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-15.4M | $44.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.9M | $41.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-48.0M | $33.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-47.7M | $32.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.0M | $35.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.6M | $32.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.6M | $37.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 42.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -4.9% | 40.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 38.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.3% | 32.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.7% | 34.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.9% | 37.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.1% | 33.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.9% | 38.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 28.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -10.4% | 32.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.0% | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -33.4% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -33.3% | 27.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.5% | 29.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.4% | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.5% | 30.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.37 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.34 | $0.44 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.12 | $0.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.05 | $0.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.04 | $0.32 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.25 | $0.31 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | $0.36 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $336.6M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $154.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.7B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $12.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $336.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $279.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $270.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $253.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $377.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $280.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $336.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $154.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $261.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $262.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $262.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $262.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $263.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $136.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $136.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $12.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $12.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $12.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $12.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $11.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $11.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $12.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $11.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.10× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.10× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $20.8M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $14.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $30.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $20.8M | $187.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2M | $49.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.8M | $30.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.4M | $55.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $129.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.7M | $53.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.8M | $22.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.7M | $171.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.0M | $113.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | 124.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.0% | 94.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | 12.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.18× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.04× | 1.20× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.61× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AZTA
| Multiomics | $67.2M | 45% |
| Core Products | $47.6M | 32% |
| Sample Repository Solutions | $33.8M | 23% |
FCF
Segment breakdown not available.
