vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (BABA) and RIO TINTO PLC (RIO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($38.8B vs $30.8B, roughly 1.3× RIO TINTO PLC). RIO TINTO PLC runs the higher net margin — 18.6% vs 5.8%, a 12.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Alibaba Group Holding Limited, branded as Alibaba, is a Chinese multinational technology company specializing in e-commerce, retail, Internet, and technology. Founded on 28 June 1999 in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, the company provides consumer-to-consumer (C2C), business-to-consumer (B2C), and business-to-business (B2B) sales services via Chinese and global marketplaces, as well as local consumer, digital media and entertainment, logistics, and cloud computing services. It owns and operates a diverse...
Rio Tinto Group is a British-Australian multinational mining company headquartered in London, England, and Melbourne, Australia. It was founded in 1873 when a group of British investors purchased a mine complex on the Río Tinto, in Huelva, Spain, from the Spanish government. It has grown through a long series of mergers and acquisitions and is today a major producer of commodities such as copper, iron ore, aluminium and lithium.
BABA vs RIO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $38.8B | $30.8B |
| Net Profit | $2.2B | $5.7B |
| Gross Margin | 40.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 6.6% | 25.9% |
| Net Margin | 5.8% | 18.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 14.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 0.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $6.64 | $3.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $38.8B | $30.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.7B | $26.9B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $27.4B | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $25.8B |
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8B | $5.7B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $3.6B |
| Q4 25 | 40.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.0% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | 27.5% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 27.7% | ||
| Q4 22 | — | 30.0% |
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | 18.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q4 22 | — | 14.0% |
| Q4 25 | $6.64 | $3.32 | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.72 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.20 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.40 | $3.51 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $3.03 | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $2.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $18.3B | $9.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $21.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $148.7B | $67.0B |
| Total Assets | $268.6B | $128.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.33× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $18.3B | $9.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.3B | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $10.7B | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $8.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | $21.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.4B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $13.0B | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $11.1B |
| Q4 25 | $148.7B | $67.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $145.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $139.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $137.2B | $58.0B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $56.3B | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $52.7B |
| Q4 25 | $268.6B | $128.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $264.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $248.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $254.1B | $102.8B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $103.5B | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $96.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 0.23× | ||
| Q4 22 | — | 0.21× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.2B | $9.9B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $2.3B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 7.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 24.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.31× | 1.73× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $11.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.2B | $9.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7B | $8.5B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $8.2B | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $5.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.9% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 22 | — | 8.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 24.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q4 22 | — | 14.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.31× | 1.73× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.49× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.19× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.43× | 1.50× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 1.64× | ||
| Q4 22 | — | 1.57× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BABA
| Alibaba China E-commerce Group | $22.8B | 59% |
| All others | $9.6B | 25% |
| Cloud Intelligence Group | $6.2B | 16% |
RIO
Segment breakdown not available.
