vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM) and Lennox International (LII). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Lennox International is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.1× Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.). Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 56.7% vs 13.6%, a 43.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. is a Canadian-American alternative asset manager. The company was founded in December 2022 as a spin-off of the asset management operations of Brookfield Corporation, and manages investments across real estate, infrastructure, renewable energy, private equity, and credit markets globally.

Lennox International Inc. is an American provider of climate control products for the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) and refrigeration markets. Based in Richardson, Texas, the company is 9.8% owned by John W. Norris, III, a descendant of DW Norris, who acquired the company in 1904. The company's largest production facilities are in Saltillo, Mexico, Marshalltown, Iowa, and Orangeburg, South Carolina.

BAM vs LII — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
LII
LII
1.1× larger
LII
$1.2B
$1.1B
BAM
Higher net margin
BAM
BAM
43.1% more per $
BAM
56.7%
13.6%
LII

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
BAM
BAM
LII
LII
Revenue
$1.1B
$1.2B
Net Profit
$615.0M
$162.1M
Gross Margin
34.7%
Operating Margin
84.2%
18.6%
Net Margin
56.7%
13.6%
Revenue YoY
-11.2%
Net Profit YoY
-18.0%
EPS (diluted)
$4.62

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BAM
BAM
LII
LII
Q4 25
$1.1B
$1.2B
Q3 25
$974.0M
$1.4B
Q2 25
$931.0M
$1.5B
Q1 25
$954.0M
$1.1B
Q4 24
$1.3B
Q3 24
$873.0M
$1.5B
Q2 24
$821.0M
$1.5B
Q1 24
$786.0M
$1.0B
Net Profit
BAM
BAM
LII
LII
Q4 25
$615.0M
$162.1M
Q3 25
$692.0M
$245.8M
Q2 25
$584.0M
$277.6M
Q1 25
$507.0M
$120.3M
Q4 24
$197.7M
Q3 24
$537.0M
$239.0M
Q2 24
$124.0M
$245.9M
Q1 24
$373.0M
$124.3M
Gross Margin
BAM
BAM
LII
LII
Q4 25
34.7%
Q3 25
32.8%
Q2 25
34.8%
Q1 25
30.6%
Q4 24
33.9%
Q3 24
32.6%
Q2 24
33.6%
Q1 24
32.5%
Operating Margin
BAM
BAM
LII
LII
Q4 25
84.2%
18.6%
Q3 25
79.1%
21.7%
Q2 25
70.8%
23.6%
Q1 25
61.0%
14.5%
Q4 24
18.2%
Q3 24
72.5%
20.2%
Q2 24
80.4%
22.1%
Q1 24
56.5%
15.9%
Net Margin
BAM
BAM
LII
LII
Q4 25
56.7%
13.6%
Q3 25
71.0%
17.2%
Q2 25
62.7%
18.5%
Q1 25
53.1%
11.2%
Q4 24
14.7%
Q3 24
61.5%
16.0%
Q2 24
15.1%
16.9%
Q1 24
47.5%
11.9%
EPS (diluted)
BAM
BAM
LII
LII
Q4 25
$4.62
Q3 25
$6.98
Q2 25
$7.82
Q1 25
$3.37
Q4 24
$5.52
Q3 24
$6.68
Q2 24
$6.87
Q1 24
$3.47

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
BAM
BAM
LII
LII
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.6B
$34.7M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.1B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$8.9B
$1.2B
Total Assets
$17.0B
$4.1B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.98×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
BAM
BAM
LII
LII
Q4 25
$1.6B
$34.7M
Q3 25
$1.1B
$59.2M
Q2 25
$480.0M
$55.1M
Q1 25
$332.0M
$222.9M
Q4 24
$422.3M
Q3 24
$255.7M
Q2 24
$10.0M
$57.8M
Q1 24
$57.6M
Total Debt
BAM
BAM
LII
LII
Q4 25
$1.1B
Q3 25
$838.2M
Q2 25
$835.7M
Q1 25
$834.2M
Q4 24
$833.1M
Q3 24
$827.6M
Q2 24
$1.1B
Q1 24
$1.2B
Stockholders' Equity
BAM
BAM
LII
LII
Q4 25
$8.9B
$1.2B
Q3 25
$8.5B
$1.1B
Q2 25
$8.5B
$900.5M
Q1 25
$8.5B
$852.5M
Q4 24
$850.2M
Q3 24
$9.0B
$754.0M
Q2 24
$3.2B
$577.4M
Q1 24
$2.2B
$368.8M
Total Assets
BAM
BAM
LII
LII
Q4 25
$17.0B
$4.1B
Q3 25
$16.5B
$3.5B
Q2 25
$16.1B
$3.7B
Q1 25
$15.0B
$3.5B
Q4 24
$3.5B
Q3 24
$3.3B
Q2 24
$4.2B
$3.2B
Q1 24
$3.0B
Debt / Equity
BAM
BAM
LII
LII
Q4 25
0.98×
Q3 25
0.78×
Q2 25
0.93×
Q1 25
0.98×
Q4 24
0.98×
Q3 24
1.10×
Q2 24
1.95×
Q1 24
3.13×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
BAM
BAM
LII
LII
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$562.0M
$405.9M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$376.7M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
31.5%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.91×
2.50×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$638.8M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
BAM
BAM
LII
LII
Q4 25
$562.0M
$405.9M
Q3 25
$745.0M
$300.7M
Q2 25
$529.0M
$86.8M
Q1 25
$265.0M
$-35.8M
Q4 24
$332.4M
Q3 24
$567.0M
$452.1M
Q2 24
$159.0M
$184.0M
Q1 24
$516.0M
$-22.8M
Free Cash Flow
BAM
BAM
LII
LII
Q4 25
$376.7M
Q3 25
$265.1M
Q2 25
$58.3M
Q1 25
$-61.3M
Q4 24
$272.2M
Q3 24
$410.9M
Q2 24
$151.3M
Q1 24
$-52.3M
FCF Margin
BAM
BAM
LII
LII
Q4 25
31.5%
Q3 25
18.6%
Q2 25
3.9%
Q1 25
-5.7%
Q4 24
20.2%
Q3 24
27.4%
Q2 24
10.4%
Q1 24
-5.0%
Capex Intensity
BAM
BAM
LII
LII
Q4 25
2.4%
Q3 25
2.5%
Q2 25
1.9%
Q1 25
2.4%
Q4 24
4.5%
Q3 24
2.8%
Q2 24
2.3%
Q1 24
2.8%
Cash Conversion
BAM
BAM
LII
LII
Q4 25
0.91×
2.50×
Q3 25
1.08×
1.22×
Q2 25
0.91×
0.31×
Q1 25
0.52×
-0.30×
Q4 24
1.68×
Q3 24
1.06×
1.89×
Q2 24
1.28×
0.75×
Q1 24
1.38×
-0.18×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

BAM
BAM

Incentive Fees$452.0M42%
Infrastruture$332.0M31%
Private Equity$174.0M16%
Renewable Power And Transition$66.0M6%
Other$47.0M4%
Management And Advisory Fees$14.0M1%

LII
LII

Residential Heating And Cooling$699.8M59%
Commercial Heating And Cooling$495.2M41%

Related Comparisons