vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CBL International Ltd (BANL) and ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP (EFSC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CBL International Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($277.2M vs $185.2M, roughly 1.5× ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP). ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP runs the higher net margin — 26.6% vs -0.6%, a 27.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
The Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (HPE) is an American multinational information technology company based in Spring, Texas. It is a business-focused organization which works in servers, storage, networking, containerization software and consulting and support. HPE was ranked No. 107 in the 2018 Fortune 500 list of the largest United States corporations by total revenue.
BANL vs EFSC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $277.2M | $185.2M |
| Net Profit | $-1.6M | $49.4M |
| Gross Margin | 1.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -0.5% | — |
| Net Margin | -0.6% | 26.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -1.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.30 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $185.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $193.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $206.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $277.2M | $173.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $166.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.5M | $167.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $164.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $192.0M | $156.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $49.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $54.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $45.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.6M | $51.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $50.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.9M | $48.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $50.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $45.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.5% | 37.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 36.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 26.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 28.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.6% | 29.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 30.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.7% | 29.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 30.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 29.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.30 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.45 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.19 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.36 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.31 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.14 | $1.27 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.19 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $22.9M | $2.1B |
| Total Assets | $69.3M | $17.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.3M | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $17.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $16.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $69.3M | $16.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $69.3M | $15.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $15.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $53.5M | $14.6B |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BANL
Segment breakdown not available.
EFSC
| Net Interest Income | $166.1M | 90% |
| Noninterest Income | $19.1M | 10% |
