vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CREDICORP LTD (BAP) and eHealth, Inc. (EHTH), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Credicorp is a financial services holding company in Peru with a presence in Colombia, Bolivia, Chile, Panama and the United States. It currently has a universal banking, insurance and pension platform, with a microfinance, investment banking and wealth management presence in Latin America. Krealo, the innovative arm of the corporation, creates and invests in fintechs and startups in Latin America.
eHealth, Inc., doing business as eHealthInsurance, is a publicly traded online marketplace for health insurance, organized in Delaware and based in Santa Clara, California. The company primarily provides plans related to Medicare such as prescription drug plans, Medigap, and Medicare Advantage plans. The company also sells individual plans, competing with health insurance marketplaces. The company sells plans in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia from 170 health insurance carrier...
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $326.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $53.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $60.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $113.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $315.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $58.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $65.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $93.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-31.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-17.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $97.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-42.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-28.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-17.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 55.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 52.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 28.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 38.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -77.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -37.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 35.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -74.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -42.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -19.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 26.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -58.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -28.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 30.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -72.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -42.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -18.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.43 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.46 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.98 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.33 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.93 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.83 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.33 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.96 |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
