vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. (BBCP) and LEGALZOOM.COM, INC. (LZ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LEGALZOOM.COM, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($206.8M vs $98.9M, roughly 2.1× Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc.). Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.4% vs 0.5%, a 4.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LEGALZOOM.COM, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.9% vs -3.2%). LEGALZOOM.COM, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($41.0M vs $1.9M). Over the past eight quarters, LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (8.0% CAGR vs 4.8%).
Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. is a leading provider of concrete pumping services and equipment rental solutions across the U.S. and U.K. It serves core construction segments including infrastructure, commercial real estate development, and residential building, supporting efficient, safe concrete placement for projects of all sizes.
LegalZoom.com, Inc. is an American online legal technology and services company launched in 2001. It provides online legal services using an independent network of attorneys and the LegalZoom-owned law firm, LegalZoom Legal Services, as well as self-service technology and care specialists. Services include wills and living trusts, business compliance such as licenses and permits, copyright registrations, and trademark applications. The company also offers attorney referrals and registered age...
BBCP vs LZ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $98.9M | $206.8M |
| Net Profit | $5.3M | $1.1M |
| Gross Margin | 43.8% | 64.0% |
| Operating Margin | 17.0% | 1.3% |
| Net Margin | 5.4% | 0.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.2% | 12.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -43.6% | -78.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.09 | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $206.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $98.9M | $190.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.2M | $190.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.2M | $192.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.0M | $183.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.1M | $161.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $100.6M | $168.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.7M | $177.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.3M | $6.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7M | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.0K | $-266.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.6M | $5.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4M | $12.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.6M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0M | $1.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 64.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.8% | 67.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.9% | 67.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.5% | 65.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.0% | 63.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.3% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.3% | 67.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.3% | 64.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.0% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.7% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.7% | -1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.5% | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.8% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.5% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.2% | 0.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.0% | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.4% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.2% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.1% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.09 | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.07 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.06 | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.05 | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $44.4M | $183.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $417.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $264.8M | $146.9M |
| Total Assets | $879.5M | $491.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.58× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $183.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $44.4M | $203.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.0M | $237.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.8M | $217.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $85.1M | $210.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.0M | $142.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.3M | $112.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.0M | $118.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $417.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $417.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $417.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $417.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $373.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $372.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $372.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $146.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $264.8M | $171.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.3M | $201.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $261.8M | $194.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $260.7M | $187.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $321.7M | $93.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $314.7M | $60.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.3M | $60.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $491.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $879.5M | $511.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $886.0M | $551.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $878.8M | $543.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $912.9M | $532.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $898.0M | $373.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $890.8M | $348.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $894.7M | $359.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.58× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.60× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.59× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.60× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.16× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.21× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $14.5M | $47.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.9M | $41.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.9% | 19.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.72× | 42.83× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $17.5M | $147.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $47.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.5M | $34.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.1M | $54.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.7M | $39.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0M | $50.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.4M | $42.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.0M | $31.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.1M | $27.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $41.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9M | $28.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.3M | $47.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.1M | $31.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $191.0K | $41.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.1M | $35.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.4M | $22.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | $17.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | 24.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.0% | 16.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 22.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.8% | 22.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.2% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.9% | 9.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.7% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.0% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.5% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.6% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 42.83× | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.72× | 5.63× | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.16× | 12.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.89× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.38× | 3.31× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.63× | 2.86× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.00× | 20.74× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BBCP
| US Concrete Pumping | $72.2M | 73% |
| US Concrete Waste Management Services | $21.3M | 22% |
| Other | $5.4M | 5% |
LZ
| Subscription | $130.2M | 63% |
| Transaction | $76.6M | 37% |
