vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BRUNSWICK CORP (BC) and ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (ZION). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BRUNSWICK CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $891.0M, roughly 1.5× ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION). ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION runs the higher net margin — 29.5% vs 1.5%, a 28.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BRUNSWICK CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.3% vs 8.7%). ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION produced more free cash flow last quarter ($952.0M vs $-116.8M). Over the past eight quarters, ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION's revenue compounded faster (9.6% CAGR vs -2.3%).
Brunswick Corporation, formerly known as the Brunswick-Balke-Collender Company, is an American corporation that has been developing, manufacturing and marketing a wide variety of products since 1845. Brunswick has more than 13,000 employees in 24 countries. Brunswick owns a number of brands, including Mercury Marine. In 2024, Brunswick reported sales of US$5.2 billion. Brunswick's global headquarters is in the northern Chicago suburb of Mettawa, Illinois.
Zions Bancorporation is an American national bank headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah. It operates as a national bank rather than as a bank holding company and does business under the following seven brands: Zions Bank, Amegy Bank of Texas, California Bank and Trust, National Bank of Arizona, Nevada State Bank, Vectra Bank Colorado, and the Commerce Bank of Washington.
BC vs ZION — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $891.0M |
| Net Profit | $21.0M | $263.0M |
| Gross Margin | 24.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 3.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 1.5% | 29.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.3% | 8.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 21.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.32 | $1.77 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $891.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $861.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $838.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $795.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $820.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $792.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $777.0M |
| Q1 26 | $21.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.7M | $263.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-235.5M | $222.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.3M | $244.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.2M | $170.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-82.5M | $216.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.6M | $214.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.0M | $201.0M |
| Q1 26 | 24.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -17.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 29.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -17.3% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | 29.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 21.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.1% | 26.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.5% | 27.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | 25.9% |
| Q1 26 | $0.32 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.32 | $1.77 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.59 | $1.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.89 | $1.63 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | $1.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.21 | $1.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.67 | $1.37 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.48 | $1.28 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $277.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $490.2M | $1.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6B | $7.2B |
| Total Assets | $5.5B | $89.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.31× | 0.21× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $277.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $256.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $297.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $315.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $286.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $269.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $284.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $494.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | $490.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $970.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $964.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $950.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $548.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $546.0M |
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $6.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $6.0B |
| Q1 26 | $5.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.3B | $89.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4B | $88.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | $88.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.9B | $88.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.7B | $88.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.0B | $87.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4B | $87.6B |
| Q1 26 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.30× | 0.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.25× | 0.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.09× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-116.8M | $952.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -8.5% | 106.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.2% | 13.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.08× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $344.6M | $1.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $132.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $140.4M | $438.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $316.2M | $-62.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-27.4M | $179.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $306.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.4M | $119.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $211.0M | $251.0M |
| Q1 26 | $-116.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $83.6M | $952.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.5M | $413.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $271.3M | $-93.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.1M | $152.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.4M | $97.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $163.9M | $234.0M |
| Q1 26 | -8.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | 106.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.8% | 48.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.7% | -11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.3% | 19.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.9% | 128.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 12.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.4% | 30.1% |
| Q1 26 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.7% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 2.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.11× | 4.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.97× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.33× | -0.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.36× | 1.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.31× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.51× | 0.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.11× | 1.25× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
