vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BCB BANCORP INC (BCBP) and Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BCB BANCORP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.2M vs $13.3M, roughly 2.0× Laird Superfood, Inc.). Laird Superfood, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -13.2% vs -49.7%, a 36.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laird Superfood, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.0% vs 13.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs 1.8%).
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
BCBP vs LSF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.2M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | $-12.0M | $-1.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | -71.9% | -13.5% |
| Net Margin | -49.7% | -13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.1% | 15.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -467.6% | -341.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.73 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $26.2M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.5M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.2M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.8M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.1M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.2M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.4M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.3M | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.0M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.3M | $-975.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6M | $-362.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.3M | $-156.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | $-398.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.7M | $-166.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | $-239.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.9M | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 40.0% |
| Q4 25 | -71.9% | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.9% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.9% | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -49.2% | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.9% | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.7% | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.5% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.0% | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | -49.7% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.1% | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.2% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -35.0% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.1% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.5% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.8% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.2% | -10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.73 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.22 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.51 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.17 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.36 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.14 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.32 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $5.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $304.3M | $11.5M |
| Total Assets | $3.3B | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | $304.3M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $318.5M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $315.7M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $314.7M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $323.9M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $328.1M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $320.7M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $320.1M | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6B | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8B | $17.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $35.9M | $68.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $34.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 133.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $58.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $35.9M | $68.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.7M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.3M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.0M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.7M | $339.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.5M | $305.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.1M | $642.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.3M | $-422.3K |
| Q4 25 | $34.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $66.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 133.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 287.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 166.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.05× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.90× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.70× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.53× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.88× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.41× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BCBP
Segment breakdown not available.
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
