vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BCB BANCORP INC (BCBP) and ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES INC (OSUR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.8M vs $26.2M, roughly 1.0× BCB BANCORP INC). BCB BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — -49.7% vs -72.1%, a 22.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BCB BANCORP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.1% vs -28.5%). BCB BANCORP INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($34.9M vs $-9.9M). Over the past eight quarters, BCB BANCORP INC's revenue compounded faster (1.8% CAGR vs -29.7%).
OraSure Technologies, Inc. is a Bethlehem, Pennsylvania–based company in the medical device industry. Their products include diagnostic testing kits. The company had recently developed OraQuick testing kit, the first over-the-counter home HIV test.
BCBP vs OSUR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.2M | $26.8M |
| Net Profit | $-12.0M | $-19.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.0% |
| Operating Margin | -71.9% | -75.1% |
| Net Margin | -49.7% | -72.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.1% | -28.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -467.6% | -78.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.73 | $-0.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $26.2M | $26.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.5M | $27.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.2M | $31.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.8M | $29.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.1M | $37.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.2M | $39.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.4M | $54.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.3M | $54.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.0M | $-19.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.3M | $-13.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6M | $-19.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.3M | $-16.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.7M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | $-615.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.9M | $-3.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 41.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 43.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 42.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 42.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 44.5% |
| Q4 25 | -71.9% | -75.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.9% | -59.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.9% | -57.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -49.2% | -59.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.9% | -33.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.7% | -15.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.5% | -5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.0% | -13.1% |
| Q4 25 | -49.7% | -72.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.1% | -50.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.2% | -63.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -35.0% | -53.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.1% | -28.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.5% | -11.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.8% | -1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.2% | -6.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.73 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.22 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.18 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.51 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.17 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.36 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.14 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.32 | $-0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $199.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $304.3M | $340.8M |
| Total Assets | $3.3B | $403.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $199.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $216.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $234.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $247.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $267.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $278.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $267.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $263.8M |
| Q4 25 | $304.3M | $340.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $318.5M | $362.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $315.7M | $380.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $314.7M | $396.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $323.9M | $410.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $328.1M | $425.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $320.7M | $425.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $320.1M | $426.3M |
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $403.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $423.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $445.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $457.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6B | $479.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $464.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | $466.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8B | $467.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $35.9M | $-9.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $34.9M | $-9.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 133.3% | -37.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $58.2M | $-53.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $35.9M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.7M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.3M | $-10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.0M | $-19.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.7M | $109.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.5M | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.1M | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.3M | $6.7M |
| Q4 25 | $34.9M | $-9.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.5M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $-12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7M | $-20.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $66.5M | $-347.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.4M | $12.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.1M | $6.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.1M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | 133.3% | -37.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.0% | -40.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.4% | -38.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.8% | -67.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 287.5% | -0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 166.0% | 31.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.6% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.3% | 9.5% |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.05× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.90× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.70× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.53× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.88× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.41× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BCBP
Segment breakdown not available.
OSUR
| Product And Services | $24.9M | 93% |
| Other | $1.9M | 7% |
