vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of BELDEN INC. (BDC) and SIGNET JEWELERS LTD (SIG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

SIGNET JEWELERS LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $696.4M, roughly 2.0× BELDEN INC.). BELDEN INC. runs the higher net margin — 7.3% vs 1.4%, a 5.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BELDEN INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.4% vs 3.1%). SIGNET JEWELERS LTD produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-1.5M vs $-63.1M). Over the past eight quarters, BELDEN INC.'s revenue compounded faster (7.3% CAGR vs -25.4%).

Belden Inc. is an American, multinational, publicly traded company specializing in the design, manufacture, and distribution of end-to-end networking, security and connectivity products. The company serves the Industrial Automation Solutions, Smart Buildings and Broadband & 5G markets.

Signet Jewelers Ltd. is, as of 2015, the world's largest retailer of diamond jewellery. The company is domiciled in Bermuda and headquartered in Akron, Ohio through the Fairlawn suburb, and is listed on the New York Stock Exchange. The group operates in the middle-market jewellery segment and holds number one positions in the US, Canada, and UK speciality jewellery markets. Certain brands operate in the upper middle market. Signet Jewelers owns and operates the companies Blue Nile, Zales, Kay...

BDC vs SIG — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
SIG
SIG
2.0× larger
SIG
$1.4B
$696.4M
BDC
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
BDC
BDC
+8.3% gap
BDC
11.4%
3.1%
SIG
Higher net margin
BDC
BDC
5.9% more per $
BDC
7.3%
1.4%
SIG
More free cash flow
SIG
SIG
$61.6M more FCF
SIG
$-1.5M
$-63.1M
BDC
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
BDC
BDC
Annualised
BDC
7.3%
-25.4%
SIG

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
BDC
BDC
SIG
SIG
Revenue
$696.4M
$1.4B
Net Profit
$51.0M
$20.0M
Gross Margin
37.1%
37.3%
Operating Margin
11.2%
1.7%
Net Margin
7.3%
1.4%
Revenue YoY
11.4%
3.1%
Net Profit YoY
-1.8%
185.7%
EPS (diluted)
$1.30
$0.49

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BDC
BDC
SIG
SIG
Q1 26
$696.4M
Q4 25
$720.1M
$1.4B
Q3 25
$698.2M
$1.5B
Q2 25
$672.0M
$1.5B
Q1 25
$624.9M
$2.4B
Q4 24
$666.0M
$1.3B
Q3 24
$654.9M
$1.5B
Q2 24
$604.3M
$1.5B
Net Profit
BDC
BDC
SIG
SIG
Q1 26
$51.0M
Q4 25
$67.9M
$20.0M
Q3 25
$56.7M
$-9.1M
Q2 25
$61.0M
$33.5M
Q1 25
$51.9M
$100.6M
Q4 24
$58.4M
$7.0M
Q3 24
$53.7M
$-98.5M
Q2 24
$49.0M
$52.1M
Gross Margin
BDC
BDC
SIG
SIG
Q1 26
37.1%
Q4 25
36.6%
37.3%
Q3 25
37.7%
38.6%
Q2 25
38.5%
38.8%
Q1 25
39.3%
42.6%
Q4 24
37.5%
36.0%
Q3 24
37.3%
38.0%
Q2 24
37.5%
37.9%
Operating Margin
BDC
BDC
SIG
SIG
Q1 26
11.2%
Q4 25
12.2%
1.7%
Q3 25
10.9%
0.2%
Q2 25
11.8%
3.1%
Q1 25
11.6%
6.5%
Q4 24
10.4%
0.7%
Q3 24
11.5%
-6.8%
Q2 24
11.4%
3.3%
Net Margin
BDC
BDC
SIG
SIG
Q1 26
7.3%
Q4 25
9.4%
1.4%
Q3 25
8.1%
-0.6%
Q2 25
9.1%
2.2%
Q1 25
8.3%
4.3%
Q4 24
8.8%
0.5%
Q3 24
8.2%
-6.6%
Q2 24
8.1%
3.4%
EPS (diluted)
BDC
BDC
SIG
SIG
Q1 26
$1.30
Q4 25
$1.70
$0.49
Q3 25
$1.41
$-0.22
Q2 25
$1.53
$0.78
Q1 25
$1.27
$2.25
Q4 24
$1.41
$0.12
Q3 24
$1.30
$-2.28
Q2 24
$1.19
$-0.90

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
BDC
BDC
SIG
SIG
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$272.2M
$234.7M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.3B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.3B
$1.7B
Total Assets
$5.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.98×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
BDC
BDC
SIG
SIG
Q1 26
$272.2M
Q4 25
$389.9M
$234.7M
Q3 25
$314.3M
$281.4M
Q2 25
$301.5M
$264.1M
Q1 25
$259.0M
$604.0M
Q4 24
$370.3M
$157.7M
Q3 24
$323.0M
$403.1M
Q2 24
$564.8M
$729.3M
Total Debt
BDC
BDC
SIG
SIG
Q1 26
$1.3B
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
BDC
BDC
SIG
SIG
Q1 26
$1.3B
Q4 25
$1.3B
$1.7B
Q3 25
$1.2B
$1.7B
Q2 25
$1.2B
$1.8B
Q1 25
$1.2B
$1.9B
Q4 24
$1.3B
$1.8B
Q3 24
$1.2B
$1.9B
Q2 24
$1.2B
$2.1B
Total Assets
BDC
BDC
SIG
SIG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$3.5B
$5.4B
Q3 25
$3.4B
$5.3B
Q2 25
$3.4B
$5.5B
Q1 25
$3.3B
$5.7B
Q4 24
$3.3B
$5.7B
Q3 24
$3.3B
$5.6B
Q2 24
$3.5B
$6.2B
Debt / Equity
BDC
BDC
SIG
SIG
Q1 26
0.98×
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
BDC
BDC
SIG
SIG
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$31.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-63.1M
$-1.5M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-9.1%
-0.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
6.4%
2.3%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.55×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$180.4M
$591.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
BDC
BDC
SIG
SIG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$160.4M
$31.0M
Q3 25
$105.0M
$86.3M
Q2 25
$82.0M
$-175.3M
Q1 25
$7.4M
$780.7M
Q4 24
$174.7M
$-75.4M
Q3 24
$91.7M
$43.8M
Q2 24
$83.0M
$-158.2M
Free Cash Flow
BDC
BDC
SIG
SIG
Q1 26
$-63.1M
Q4 25
$121.3M
$-1.5M
Q3 25
$65.3M
$62.3M
Q2 25
$56.9M
$-211.9M
Q1 25
$-24.8M
$742.1M
Q4 24
$116.4M
$-138.5M
Q3 24
$67.2M
$15.8M
Q2 24
$61.0M
$-181.5M
FCF Margin
BDC
BDC
SIG
SIG
Q1 26
-9.1%
Q4 25
16.8%
-0.1%
Q3 25
9.4%
4.1%
Q2 25
8.5%
-13.7%
Q1 25
-4.0%
31.5%
Q4 24
17.5%
-10.3%
Q3 24
10.3%
1.1%
Q2 24
10.1%
-12.0%
Capex Intensity
BDC
BDC
SIG
SIG
Q1 26
6.4%
Q4 25
5.4%
2.3%
Q3 25
5.7%
1.6%
Q2 25
3.7%
2.4%
Q1 25
5.2%
1.6%
Q4 24
8.8%
4.7%
Q3 24
3.7%
1.9%
Q2 24
3.6%
1.5%
Cash Conversion
BDC
BDC
SIG
SIG
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.36×
1.55×
Q3 25
1.85×
Q2 25
1.34×
-5.23×
Q1 25
0.14×
7.76×
Q4 24
2.99×
-10.77×
Q3 24
1.71×
Q2 24
1.69×
-3.04×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

BDC
BDC

Segment breakdown not available.

SIG
SIG

Other$571.9M41%
Zale Jewelry$243.4M17%
Extended Service Plan$129.6M9%
Diamonds Direct$87.9M6%
Blue Nile$74.3M5%
Extended Service Plan And Other Deferred Revenue$69.9M5%
Banter By Piercing Pagoda$69.2M5%
Watches$48.7M3%
Peoples$42.2M3%
James Allen$27.8M2%

Related Comparisons