vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bloom Energy Corp (BE) and Churchill Downs Inc (CHDN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Bloom Energy Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($751.1M vs $663.0M, roughly 1.1× Churchill Downs Inc). Churchill Downs Inc runs the higher net margin — 12.5% vs 9.4%, a 3.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Churchill Downs Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.1% vs -3.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Bloom Energy Corp's revenue compounded faster (51.7% CAGR vs -13.7%).
KR Sridhar is an Indian American engineer, inventor, professor, and entrepreneur. He is the founder, chairman, and chief executive officer (CEO) of Bloom Energy. Prior, Sridhar was a professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering and the Director of the Space Technologies Laboratory (STL) at the University of Arizona. He worked with and advised NASA, and is a member of the National Academy of Engineering.
Churchill Downs Incorporated is the parent company of Churchill Downs. The company has evolved from one racetrack in Louisville, Kentucky, to a multi American-state-wide, publicly traded company with racetracks, casinos and an online wagering company among its portfolio of businesses.
BE vs CHDN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $751.1M | $663.0M |
| Net Profit | $70.7M | $83.0M |
| Gross Margin | 30.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 17.3% | 21.6% |
| Net Margin | 9.4% | 12.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.4% | 3.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 396.7% | 7.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $1.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $751.1M | $663.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $772.8M | $665.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $513.3M | $683.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $396.3M | $934.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $319.3M | $642.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $567.0M | $624.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.8M | $628.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $326.5M | $890.7M |
| Q1 26 | $70.7M | $83.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4M | $51.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-23.0M | $38.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-42.2M | $216.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.4M | $76.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $105.2M | $71.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-14.6M | $65.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-61.2M | $209.3M |
| Q1 26 | 30.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | 17.3% | 21.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.3% | 18.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.9% | 35.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.0% | 20.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.5% | 20.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.0% | 20.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.1% | 37.0% |
| Q1 26 | 9.4% | 12.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.5% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.6% | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.3% | 11.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.5% | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.5% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.7% | 23.5% |
| Q1 26 | $0.44 | $1.16 | ||
| Q4 25 | $99.91 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-100.00 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.18 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.45 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.27 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $200.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $840.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $948.0K | — |
| Total Assets | $4.7B | $7.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $200.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $200.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $595.1M | $180.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $574.8M | $182.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $794.8M | $174.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $802.9M | $175.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $495.7M | $152.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $581.7M | $140.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $840.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $948.0K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $768.6M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $653.1M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $594.6M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $578.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $562.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $430.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $423.3M | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $4.7B | $7.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $7.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $7.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $7.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.41× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.91× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.96× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.62× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.66× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $295.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $295.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $418.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.7M | $187.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-213.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-110.7M | $246.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $484.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-69.5M | $169.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-175.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $395.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.4M | $166.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-220.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-124.9M | $233.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $473.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-83.8M | $154.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-187.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 51.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 24.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -55.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -39.1% | 36.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 83.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -26.0% | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -57.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 2.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.55× | ||
| Q4 25 | 293.18× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.93× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.60× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.59× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BE
| Product | $653.3M | 87% |
| Service | $61.9M | 8% |
| Installation | $25.9M | 3% |
| Electricity | $9.9M | 1% |
CHDN
| Live and Historical Racing | $297.0M | 45% |
| Gaming | $257.0M | 39% |
| Wagering Services and Solutions | $109.0M | 16% |
