vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Bloom Energy Corp (BE) and PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Bloom Energy Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($751.1M vs $538.0M, roughly 1.4× PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.). PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 1752.5% vs 9.4%, a 1743.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Bloom Energy Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (130.4% vs 14.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Bloom Energy Corp's revenue compounded faster (51.7% CAGR vs 32.7%).

KR Sridhar is an Indian American engineer, inventor, professor, and entrepreneur. He is the founder, chairman, and chief executive officer (CEO) of Bloom Energy. Prior, Sridhar was a professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering and the Director of the Space Technologies Laboratory (STL) at the University of Arizona. He worked with and advised NASA, and is a member of the National Academy of Engineering.

PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is an American residential mortgage company headquartered in Westlake Village, California. The company's business focuses on the production and servicing of U.S. mortgage loans and the management of investments related to the U.S. mortgage market. Pennymac operates through two subsidiaries: PennyMac Loan Services, LLC and PNMAC Capital Management, LLC. The latter manages the PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust, a mortgage REIT.

BE vs PFSI — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
BE
BE
1.4× larger
BE
$751.1M
$538.0M
PFSI
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
BE
BE
+115.9% gap
BE
130.4%
14.4%
PFSI
Higher net margin
PFSI
PFSI
1743.1% more per $
PFSI
1752.5%
9.4%
BE
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
BE
BE
Annualised
BE
51.7%
32.7%
PFSI

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
BE
BE
PFSI
PFSI
Revenue
$751.1M
$538.0M
Net Profit
$70.7M
$106.8M
Gross Margin
30.0%
Operating Margin
17.3%
25.0%
Net Margin
9.4%
1752.5%
Revenue YoY
130.4%
14.4%
Net Profit YoY
2.2%
EPS (diluted)
$0.44
$1.97

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BE
BE
PFSI
PFSI
Q1 26
$751.1M
Q4 25
$772.8M
$538.0M
Q3 25
$513.3M
$632.9M
Q2 25
$396.3M
$444.7M
Q1 25
$319.3M
$430.9M
Q4 24
$567.0M
$470.1M
Q3 24
$321.8M
$411.8M
Q2 24
$326.5M
$406.1M
Net Profit
BE
BE
PFSI
PFSI
Q1 26
$70.7M
Q4 25
$1.4M
$106.8M
Q3 25
$-23.0M
$181.5M
Q2 25
$-42.2M
$136.5M
Q1 25
$-23.4M
$76.3M
Q4 24
$105.2M
$104.5M
Q3 24
$-14.6M
$69.4M
Q2 24
$-61.2M
$98.3M
Gross Margin
BE
BE
PFSI
PFSI
Q1 26
30.0%
Q4 25
31.0%
Q3 25
29.5%
Q2 25
27.0%
Q1 25
27.8%
Q4 24
38.7%
Q3 24
24.5%
Q2 24
21.0%
Operating Margin
BE
BE
PFSI
PFSI
Q1 26
17.3%
Q4 25
11.3%
25.0%
Q3 25
1.5%
37.3%
Q2 25
-0.9%
17.2%
Q1 25
-6.0%
24.2%
Q4 24
18.5%
27.5%
Q3 24
-3.0%
22.8%
Q2 24
-7.1%
33.0%
Net Margin
BE
BE
PFSI
PFSI
Q1 26
9.4%
Q4 25
0.2%
1752.5%
Q3 25
-4.5%
28.7%
Q2 25
-10.6%
30.7%
Q1 25
-7.3%
17.7%
Q4 24
18.5%
2559.8%
Q3 24
-4.5%
16.8%
Q2 24
-18.7%
24.2%
EPS (diluted)
BE
BE
PFSI
PFSI
Q1 26
$0.44
Q4 25
$99.91
$1.97
Q3 25
$-100.00
$3.37
Q2 25
$-0.18
$2.54
Q1 25
$-0.10
$1.42
Q4 24
$0.45
$1.95
Q3 24
$-0.06
$1.30
Q2 24
$-0.27
$1.85

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
BE
BE
PFSI
PFSI
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$410.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$6.2B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$948.0K
$4.3B
Total Assets
$4.7B
$29.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.45×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
BE
BE
PFSI
PFSI
Q1 26
Q4 25
$2.5B
$410.0M
Q3 25
$595.1M
$62.2M
Q2 25
$574.8M
$462.3M
Q1 25
$794.8M
$443.4M
Q4 24
$802.9M
$420.6M
Q3 24
$495.7M
$667.9M
Q2 24
$581.7M
$188.8M
Total Debt
BE
BE
PFSI
PFSI
Q1 26
Q4 25
$2.6B
$6.2B
Q3 25
$1.1B
$6.2B
Q2 25
$1.1B
$5.6B
Q1 25
$1.1B
$5.8B
Q4 24
$1.1B
$5.3B
Q3 24
$1.1B
$4.9B
Q2 24
$1.1B
$4.9B
Stockholders' Equity
BE
BE
PFSI
PFSI
Q1 26
$948.0K
Q4 25
$768.6M
$4.3B
Q3 25
$653.1M
$4.2B
Q2 25
$594.6M
$4.0B
Q1 25
$578.3M
$3.9B
Q4 24
$562.5M
$3.8B
Q3 24
$430.9M
$3.7B
Q2 24
$423.3M
$3.7B
Total Assets
BE
BE
PFSI
PFSI
Q1 26
$4.7B
Q4 25
$4.4B
$29.4B
Q3 25
$2.6B
$25.4B
Q2 25
$2.5B
$24.2B
Q1 25
$2.6B
$23.9B
Q4 24
$2.7B
$26.1B
Q3 24
$2.6B
$22.9B
Q2 24
$2.5B
$21.6B
Debt / Equity
BE
BE
PFSI
PFSI
Q1 26
Q4 25
3.41×
1.45×
Q3 25
1.73×
1.48×
Q2 25
1.91×
1.38×
Q1 25
1.96×
1.48×
Q4 24
2.01×
1.37×
Q3 24
2.62×
1.32×
Q2 24
2.66×
1.35×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
BE
BE
PFSI
PFSI
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-1.7B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-1.7B
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-309.3%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
-15.46×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-1.4B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
BE
BE
PFSI
PFSI
Q1 26
Q4 25
$418.1M
$-1.7B
Q3 25
$19.7M
$-697.4M
Q2 25
$-213.1M
$-131.3M
Q1 25
$-110.7M
$1.1B
Q4 24
$484.2M
$-4.5B
Q3 24
$-69.5M
$-393.7M
Q2 24
$-175.5M
$-1.1B
Free Cash Flow
BE
BE
PFSI
PFSI
Q1 26
Q4 25
$395.1M
$-1.7B
Q3 25
$7.4M
$-699.4M
Q2 25
$-220.4M
$-132.6M
Q1 25
$-124.9M
$1.1B
Q4 24
$473.1M
$-4.5B
Q3 24
$-83.8M
$-393.9M
Q2 24
$-187.5M
$-1.1B
FCF Margin
BE
BE
PFSI
PFSI
Q1 26
Q4 25
51.1%
-309.3%
Q3 25
1.4%
-110.5%
Q2 25
-55.6%
-29.8%
Q1 25
-39.1%
247.3%
Q4 24
83.4%
-964.7%
Q3 24
-26.0%
-95.6%
Q2 24
-57.4%
-269.2%
Capex Intensity
BE
BE
PFSI
PFSI
Q1 26
Q4 25
3.0%
2.2%
Q3 25
2.4%
0.3%
Q2 25
1.8%
0.3%
Q1 25
4.5%
0.1%
Q4 24
2.0%
0.4%
Q3 24
4.4%
0.0%
Q2 24
3.7%
0.1%
Cash Conversion
BE
BE
PFSI
PFSI
Q1 26
Q4 25
293.18×
-15.46×
Q3 25
-3.84×
Q2 25
-0.96×
Q1 25
13.97×
Q4 24
4.60×
-43.39×
Q3 24
-5.68×
Q2 24
-11.12×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

BE
BE

Product$653.3M87%
Service$61.9M8%
Installation$25.9M3%
Electricity$9.9M1%

PFSI
PFSI

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons