vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bloom Energy Corp (BE) and RH (RH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RH is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($883.8M vs $751.1M, roughly 1.2× Bloom Energy Corp). Bloom Energy Corp runs the higher net margin — 9.4% vs 4.1%, a 5.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Bloom Energy Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (130.4% vs 8.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Bloom Energy Corp's revenue compounded faster (51.7% CAGR vs 9.4%).
KR Sridhar is an Indian American engineer, inventor, professor, and entrepreneur. He is the founder, chairman, and chief executive officer (CEO) of Bloom Energy. Prior, Sridhar was a professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering and the Director of the Space Technologies Laboratory (STL) at the University of Arizona. He worked with and advised NASA, and is a member of the National Academy of Engineering.
RH is an upscale American home-furnishings company headquartered in Corte Madera, California. The company sells its merchandise through its retail stores, catalog, and online. As of August 2018, the company operated a total of 70 galleries, 18 full-line design galleries, and 3 baby-and-child galleries. The company also has 36 outlet stores in the United States and Canada.
BE vs RH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $751.1M | $883.8M |
| Net Profit | $70.7M | $36.3M |
| Gross Margin | 30.0% | 44.1% |
| Operating Margin | 17.3% | 12.0% |
| Net Margin | 9.4% | 4.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 130.4% | 8.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 9.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $1.83 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $751.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $772.8M | $883.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $513.3M | $899.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $396.3M | $814.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $319.3M | $812.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $567.0M | $811.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.8M | $829.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $326.5M | $727.0M |
| Q1 26 | $70.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4M | $36.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-23.0M | $51.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-42.2M | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.4M | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $105.2M | $33.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-14.6M | $29.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-61.2M | $-3.6M |
| Q1 26 | 30.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.0% | 44.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.5% | 45.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.0% | 43.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.8% | 44.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.7% | 44.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.5% | 45.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.0% | 43.5% |
| Q1 26 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.3% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.9% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.0% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.5% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.0% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.1% | 7.5% |
| Q1 26 | 9.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.5% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.6% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.5% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.5% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.7% | -0.5% |
| Q1 26 | $0.44 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $99.91 | $1.83 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-100.00 | $2.62 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.18 | $0.40 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.10 | $0.71 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.45 | $1.66 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | $1.45 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.27 | $-0.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $43.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $948.0K | $3.3M |
| Total Assets | $4.7B | $4.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $43.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $595.1M | $34.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $574.8M | $46.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $794.8M | $30.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $802.9M | $87.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $495.7M | $78.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $581.7M | $101.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $948.0K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $768.6M | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $653.1M | $-40.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $594.6M | $-110.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $578.3M | $-163.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $562.5M | $-183.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $430.9M | $-234.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $423.3M | $-289.9M |
| Q1 26 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $4.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.41× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.91× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.96× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.62× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.66× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $131.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $83.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 9.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.64× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $128.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $418.1M | $131.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.7M | $137.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-213.1M | $86.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-110.7M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $484.2M | $-31.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-69.5M | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-175.5M | $56.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $395.1M | $83.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.4M | $80.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-220.4M | $34.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-124.9M | $-69.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $473.1M | $-96.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-83.8M | $-37.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-187.5M | $-10.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 51.1% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -55.6% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -39.1% | -8.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 83.4% | -11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -26.0% | -4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -57.4% | -1.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.5% | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 9.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 293.18× | 3.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.78× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.60× | -0.95× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BE
| Product | $653.3M | 87% |
| Service | $61.9M | 8% |
| Installation | $25.9M | 3% |
| Electricity | $9.9M | 1% |
RH
| RH Segment | $835.8M | 95% |
| Waterworks Segment | $48.0M | 5% |
| Gift Card And Merchandise Credit | $4.5M | 1% |