vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Beam Global (BEEM) and Outdoor Holding Co (POWW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Outdoor Holding Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.4M vs $9.0M, roughly 1.5× Beam Global). Outdoor Holding Co runs the higher net margin — 16.7% vs -25.8%, a 42.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Beam Global posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.7% vs -54.1%). Outdoor Holding Co produced more free cash flow last quarter ($5.0M vs $-3.8M).
Suntory Global Spirits Inc., formerly known as Beam Suntory, Inc., and before that as Beam, Inc., is an American beverage company that is a subsidiary of Suntory Holdings, a Japanese multinational beverage conglomerate. The company produces alcoholic beverages.
Vista Outdoor Inc. was an American designer, manufacturer, and marketer that operated in two segments: shooting sports and outdoor products. It was a "house of brands" with more than 40 labels and subsidiaries.
BEEM vs POWW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.0M | $13.4M |
| Net Profit | $-2.3M | $2.2M |
| Gross Margin | 17.8% | 87.1% |
| Operating Margin | -29.3% | 14.7% |
| Net Margin | -25.8% | 16.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.7% | -54.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 49.6% | 108.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.0M | $13.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8M | $12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1M | $11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $12.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5M | $12.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.5M | $12.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8M | $12.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.6M | $-50.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.3M | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.3M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-15.5M | $-77.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.6M | $-26.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.9M | $-14.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.0M | $-5.2M |
| Q4 25 | 17.8% | 87.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.5% | 87.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.3% | 87.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 87.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.3% | 87.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.7% | 86.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | 85.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -29.3% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -84.2% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -63.1% | -50.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -245.8% | -213.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -60.1% | -163.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | -50.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -32.3% | -50.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -25.8% | 16.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -84.1% | 11.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -60.5% | -54.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -245.5% | -614.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -54.5% | -208.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | -103.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -33.2% | -120.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.9% | 10.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.28 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.28 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.04 | $-0.67 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.31 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.09 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.34 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.21 | $-0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $969.0K | $69.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $24.8M | $237.3M |
| Total Assets | $42.7M | $271.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $969.0K | $69.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $65.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $63.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $30.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.6M | $31.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $33.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $50.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $55.6M |
| Q4 25 | $24.8M | $237.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.5M | $235.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.9M | $222.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.7M | $222.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.3M | $299.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.4M | $325.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.4M | $342.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $46.9M | $358.0M |
| Q4 25 | $42.7M | $271.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.6M | $270.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.7M | $269.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.8M | $297.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.5M | $355.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.3M | $368.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $71.9M | $398.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $75.7M | $403.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.8M | $5.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-3.8M | $5.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -42.3% | 37.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 4.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-11.8M | $-2.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-3.8M | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.6M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-318.0K | $-6.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $859.0K | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.0M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | $-547.5K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.0M | $4.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.8M | $5.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.1M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.1M | $-7.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $462.0K | $720.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.1M | $-10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.1M | $1.4M |
| Q4 25 | -42.3% | 37.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -87.9% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.2% | -63.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -28.7% | -18.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -27.4% | -88.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.9% | -11.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.5% | -2.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.8% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.7% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | -5.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.55× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.28× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BEEM
| Products | $7.0M | 77% |
| Other | $2.0M | 23% |
POWW
Segment breakdown not available.