vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KE Holdings Inc. (BEKE) and La Rosa Holdings Corp. (LRHC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KE Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.2B vs $20.2M, roughly 160.2× La Rosa Holdings Corp.). KE Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.2% vs -27.4%, a 30.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (72.5% CAGR vs 9.8%).
KE Holdings Inc., operating under the well-known Beike brand, is a leading integrated online and offline residential service platform based in China. It offers a full range of services including second-hand property brokerage, new housing sales agency, home rental, renovation, and related financial consultation to meet diverse housing-related demands of consumers across multiple scenarios.
V. La Rosa and Sons Macaroni Company was founded in 1914 by Vincenzo La Rosa, a Sicilian immigrant. The company eventually became one of the largest regional brands in the United States producing over 40 varieties of pasta.
BEKE vs LRHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2025 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.2B | $20.2M |
| Net Profit | $104.9M | $-5.5M |
| Gross Margin | 21.4% | 8.4% |
| Operating Margin | 2.6% | -24.7% |
| Net Margin | 3.2% | -27.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 3.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -125.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-5.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | $20.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $23.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $17.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $19.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $19.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $13.1M |
| Q4 25 | $104.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.4M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $117.9M | $-95.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $166.5M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $261.5M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.8M | $-4.6M |
| Q4 25 | 21.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.9% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.7% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.7% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.9% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.2% | 8.9% |
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | -24.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -10.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | -26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -17.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | -9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | -35.0% |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.0% | -27.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 337.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | -546.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -28.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | -12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.1% | -12.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | -35.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-5.44 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-5.86 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $28.54 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-16.49 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-12.49 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3B | $4.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $642.8K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $1.6M |
| Total Assets | $16.8B | $21.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.41× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5B | $1.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $642.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $644.3K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $645.9K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $647.6K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $649.2K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $650.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $652.4K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.6B | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.5B | $-87.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.1B | $5.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7B | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6B | $5.6M |
| Q4 25 | $16.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.3B | $21.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0B | $21.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $19.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.9B | $18.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.5B | $16.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.12× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-1.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-546.4M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.0M | $-591.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-803.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-538.3K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.64× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.38× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BEKE
| New home transaction services | $932.6M | 29% |
| Existing home transaction services | $841.5M | 26% |
| Home rental services | $804.4M | 25% |
| Home renovation and furnishing | $604.0M | 19% |
| Emerging and other services | $55.6M | 2% |
LRHC
| Real Estate Residential Brokerage Services | $16.8M | 83% |
| Transferred Over Time | $3.5M | 17% |
