vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Renewable Corp (BEPC) and COMERICA INC (CMA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Renewable Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($952.0M vs $838.0M, roughly 1.1× COMERICA INC). COMERICA INC runs the higher net margin — 21.0% vs -152.0%, a 173.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, COMERICA INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.3% vs -3.7%).
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership that owns and operates renewable power assets, with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is 60% owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
Comerica Incorporated is an American financial services company, headquartered in Dallas, Texas. It is the parent of Comerica Bank, a regional commercial bank with 413 branches in the U.S. states of Texas, Michigan, California, Florida and Arizona. Comerica is among the largest U.S. financial holding companies, with offices in a number of U.S. cities.
BEPC vs CMA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $952.0M | $838.0M |
| Net Profit | $-1.4B | $176.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | -152.0% | 21.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.7% | 3.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -326.8% | -4.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $838.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $952.0M | $849.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $829.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $825.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $811.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $989.0M | $824.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $784.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $192.0M |
| Q3 25 | — | $176.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4B | $199.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $172.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $170.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $184.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-339.0M | $206.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $138.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $33.0M |
| Q3 25 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -152.0% | 23.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 20.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.3% | 25.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 17.2% |
| Q3 25 | — | $1.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.25 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.49 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $0.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $556.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.8B | $7.4B |
| Total Assets | $46.0B | $77.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.73× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $556.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $614.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.1B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $6.2B |
| Q3 25 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.8B | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | $6.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $6.4B |
| Q3 25 | — | $77.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.0B | $78.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $77.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $79.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $79.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.6B | $79.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $79.4B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $85.8B |
| Q3 25 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.84× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.18× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 0.97× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $139.0M | $-270.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -1.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $-270.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $139.0M | $476.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $273.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $601.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $140.0M | $111.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-205.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $1.1B |
| Q3 25 | — | -1.53× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.39× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.49× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 34.00× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.