vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bank First Corp (BFC) and MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Bank First Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($44.9M vs $40.6M, roughly 1.1× MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp). Bank First Corp runs the higher net margin — 45.8% vs -19.9%, a 65.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Bank First Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.1% vs -20.7%). Bank First Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($51.0M vs $-4.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Bank First Corp's revenue compounded faster (9.1% CAGR vs -3.4%).
First Horizon Corporation, formerly First Tennessee Bank, is a financial services company, founded in 1864, and based in Memphis, Tennessee. Through its banking subsidiary First Horizon Bank, it provides financial services through locations in 12 states across the Southeast, a region in which it is the fourth largest regional bank.
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
BFC vs MX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $44.9M | $40.6M |
| Net Profit | $18.4M | $-8.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 9.3% |
| Operating Margin | 51.0% | -26.1% |
| Net Margin | 45.8% | -19.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.1% | -20.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4.8% | 50.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.87 | $-0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $44.9M | $40.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.2M | $45.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.6M | $47.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.1M | $44.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.1M | $51.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.8M | $55.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.9M | $46.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.7M | $43.4M |
| Q4 25 | $18.4M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.0M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.9M | $323.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.2M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.5M | $-16.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.6M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.1M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.4M | $-15.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 14.6% |
| Q4 25 | 51.0% | -26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.8% | -25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.7% | -15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 51.3% | -14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 54.4% | -12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.7% | -8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 51.0% | -12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.6% | -21.6% |
| Q4 25 | 45.8% | -19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.7% | -28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.5% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.3% | -19.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.3% | -31.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.6% | -17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.3% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.8% | -35.5% |
| Q4 25 | $1.87 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.83 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.71 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.82 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.75 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.65 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.59 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.51 | $-0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $243.2M | $103.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $643.8M | $248.3M |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $351.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $243.2M | $103.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $126.2M | $108.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.3M | $113.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $300.9M | $132.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $261.3M | $138.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $204.4M | $151.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.0M | $162.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $83.4M | $171.6M |
| Q4 25 | $643.8M | $248.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $628.1M | $255.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $612.3M | $270.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $648.4M | $269.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $639.7M | $276.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $628.9M | $299.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $614.6M | $305.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $609.3M | $321.9M |
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $351.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $359.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | $370.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | $373.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $379.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $411.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1B | $412.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.1B | $426.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $62.5M | $5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.0M | $-4.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 113.6% | -11.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 25.5% | 25.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.40× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $75.8M | $-54.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $62.5M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.5M | $162.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.9M | $-25.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.2M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.8M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.8M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.9M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3M | $-4.0M |
| Q4 25 | $51.0M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.5M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.2M | $-37.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.6M | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.9M | $-15.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $551.0K | $-4.6M |
| Q4 25 | 113.6% | -11.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.2% | -16.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.8% | -77.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | -10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 146.3% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.5% | -28.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.3% | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | -10.7% |
| Q4 25 | 25.5% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.0% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.5% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.1% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | 3.40× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.70× | -77.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.75× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.13× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.93× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.09× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BFC
Segment breakdown not available.
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
