vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. (CBK) and MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($40.6M vs $23.1M, roughly 1.8× Commercial Bancgroup, Inc.). Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 41.3% vs -19.9%, a 61.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Commercial Bancgroup, Inc.CBKEarnings & Financial Report
Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. operates as a U.S. regional bank holding company that provides a full suite of retail and commercial banking products and services to individual consumers, small and medium-sized businesses, and local institutional clients. Its core offerings include deposit accounts, lending solutions, wealth management, and tailored financial advisory services for regional markets.
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
CBK vs MX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $23.1M | $40.6M |
| Net Profit | $9.5M | $-8.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 9.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | -26.1% |
| Net Margin | 41.3% | -19.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -20.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 9.7% | 50.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.69 | $-0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $23.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $23.5M | $40.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.8M | $45.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $47.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $44.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $51.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $55.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $46.4M |
| Q1 26 | $9.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.9M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $323.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-8.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-16.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-13.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.8% | -25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -12.3% |
| Q1 26 | 41.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 42.2% | -19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.4% | -28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -19.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -31.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -28.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.69 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.72 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.77 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $103.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $118.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $248.3M |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $351.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $103.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $154.8M | $108.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $113.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $132.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $138.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $151.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $162.5M |
| Q1 26 | $118.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $166.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $100.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $248.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $245.2M | $255.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $270.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $269.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $276.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $299.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $305.8M |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $351.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $359.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $370.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $373.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $379.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $411.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $412.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-4.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -11.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 25.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-54.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.0M | $162.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-25.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.5M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-37.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-15.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -11.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 115.8% | -16.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -77.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -28.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -4.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.96× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -77.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CBK
| Net Interest Income | $20.5M | 89% |
| Noninterest Income | $2.6M | 11% |
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
