vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SAUL CENTERS, INC. (BFS) and Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. (EVLV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SAUL CENTERS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($75.1M vs $38.5M, roughly 2.0× Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc.). Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 28.3% vs 8.7%, a 19.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.3% vs 10.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (31.8% CAGR vs 6.2%).
Saul Centers, Inc. is a self-administered real estate investment trust (REIT) headquartered in the United States. It primarily owns, operates, and develops high-quality shopping centers, mixed-use properties, and multifamily residential assets, with its core portfolio concentrated in the Washington D.C. metropolitan area and other select high-growth U.S. regional markets.
Sentient Technologies was an American artificial intelligence technology company based in San Francisco. Sentient was founded in 2007 and received over $143 million in funding at different points after its inception. As of 2016, Sentient was the world's most well-funded AI company. It focused on e-commerce, online content and trading.
BFS vs EVLV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $75.1M | $38.5M |
| Net Profit | $6.5M | $10.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 48.4% |
| Operating Margin | 65.4% | -20.7% |
| Net Margin | 8.7% | 28.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.6% | 32.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -19.6% | 169.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.15 | $0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $75.1M | $38.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $72.0M | $42.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.8M | $32.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.9M | $32.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.9M | $29.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.3M | $27.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.9M | $25.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $66.7M | $22.2M |
| Q4 25 | $6.5M | $10.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.7M | $-40.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.8M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.1M | $-15.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $-30.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.4M | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.6M | $-11.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 48.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 49.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 49.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 59.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 57.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 73.6% | 57.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 74.2% | 58.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 72.8% | 54.8% |
| Q4 25 | 65.4% | -20.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 69.1% | -20.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 68.7% | -53.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 66.5% | -45.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 82.9% | -64.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 72.8% | -70.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 75.0% | -88.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 72.4% | -98.8% |
| Q4 25 | 8.7% | 28.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.6% | -4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.1% | -124.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.6% | -5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.9% | -54.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.5% | -111.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.6% | 13.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.4% | -50.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.15 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.32 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.29 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.22 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.48 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.48 | $0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.45 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.7M | $49.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $468.4M | $28.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $307.8M | $119.4M |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $304.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.52× | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.7M | $49.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.8M | $56.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3M | $36.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.5M | $35.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.3M | $51.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $56.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.9M | $56.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $81.0M |
| Q4 25 | $468.4M | $28.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $28.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $455.8M | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | $307.8M | $119.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $316.6M | $102.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $322.4M | $92.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $328.4M | $121.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $335.8M | $117.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $341.8M | $129.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $345.7M | $151.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $347.1M | $139.8M |
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $304.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $304.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $280.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $256.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $268.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $278.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $269.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | $280.0M |
| Q4 25 | 1.52× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.02× | 0.28× | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.70× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.36× | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.37× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.17× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $99.8M | $15.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 15.35× | 1.43× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $99.8M | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.6M | $3.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.6M | $2.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.4M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $121.2M | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.5M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.1M | $-21.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.8M | $-16.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-28.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-12.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -42.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -17.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 81.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 66.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 68.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 15.35× | 1.43× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.97× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.48× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.10× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.83× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.22× | -6.31× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.48× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.