vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SAUL CENTERS, INC. (BFS) and High-Trend International Group (HTCO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
High-Trend International Group is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($99.4M vs $75.1M, roughly 1.3× SAUL CENTERS, INC.). SAUL CENTERS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 8.7% vs -13.4%, a 22.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, High-Trend International Group posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (185.2% vs 10.6%).
Saul Centers, Inc. is a self-administered real estate investment trust (REIT) headquartered in the United States. It primarily owns, operates, and develops high-quality shopping centers, mixed-use properties, and multifamily residential assets, with its core portfolio concentrated in the Washington D.C. metropolitan area and other select high-growth U.S. regional markets.
Motor Trend Group, LLC is a media company that specializes in enthusiast brands, such as Motor Trend and Hot Rod. Headquartered in El Segundo, California, it was a subsidiary of the TNT Sports division of Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) until being sold to Hearst Communications in 2024.
BFS vs HTCO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $75.1M | $99.4M |
| Net Profit | $6.5M | $-13.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 4.0% |
| Operating Margin | 65.4% | -12.5% |
| Net Margin | 8.7% | -13.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.6% | 185.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -19.6% | -1624.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.15 | $-3.29 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $75.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $72.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.8M | $99.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.9M | $34.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $66.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.7M | $-13.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.4M | $-771.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 73.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 74.2% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 72.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 65.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 69.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 68.7% | -12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 66.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 82.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 72.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 75.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 72.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.1% | -13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.6% | -2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.15 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.32 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | $-3.29 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.29 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.22 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.48 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.48 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.45 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.7M | $13.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $468.4M | $1.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $307.8M | $21.2M |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $41.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.52× | 0.05× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3M | $13.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.9M | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $468.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $1.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $455.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | $307.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $316.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $322.4M | $21.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $328.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $335.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $341.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $345.7M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $347.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $41.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.52× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.02× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.85× | 0.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.70× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.37× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.17× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $99.8M | $6.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $6.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 6.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 15.35× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $99.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.6M | $6.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $121.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.1M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-28.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-12.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -42.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -17.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 81.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 66.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 68.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 15.35× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.97× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.48× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.10× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.83× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.22× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.48× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.