vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of SAUL CENTERS, INC. (BFS) and Repay Holdings Corp (RPAY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Repay Holdings Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($78.6M vs $75.1M, roughly 1.0× SAUL CENTERS, INC.). SAUL CENTERS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 8.7% vs -178.3%, a 186.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SAUL CENTERS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.6% vs 0.4%). Over the past eight quarters, SAUL CENTERS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (6.2% CAGR vs -1.3%).

Saul Centers, Inc. is a self-administered real estate investment trust (REIT) headquartered in the United States. It primarily owns, operates, and develops high-quality shopping centers, mixed-use properties, and multifamily residential assets, with its core portfolio concentrated in the Washington D.C. metropolitan area and other select high-growth U.S. regional markets.

Repay Holdings Corp is a leading payment technology provider delivering integrated end-to-end payment processing solutions for businesses across North America. Its offerings include credit/debit card processing, ACH transfer services, POS system integrations and digital payment tools, serving retail, healthcare, automotive and e-commerce segments to help clients streamline transaction workflows and boost operational efficiency.

BFS vs RPAY — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
RPAY
RPAY
1.0× larger
RPAY
$78.6M
$75.1M
BFS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
BFS
BFS
+10.2% gap
BFS
10.6%
0.4%
RPAY
Higher net margin
BFS
BFS
186.9% more per $
BFS
8.7%
-178.3%
RPAY
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
BFS
BFS
Annualised
BFS
6.2%
-1.3%
RPAY

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
BFS
BFS
RPAY
RPAY
Revenue
$75.1M
$78.6M
Net Profit
$6.5M
$-140.1M
Gross Margin
74.2%
Operating Margin
65.4%
-182.2%
Net Margin
8.7%
-178.3%
Revenue YoY
10.6%
0.4%
Net Profit YoY
-19.6%
-3304.1%
EPS (diluted)
$0.15
$-1.68

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BFS
BFS
RPAY
RPAY
Q4 25
$75.1M
$78.6M
Q3 25
$72.0M
$77.7M
Q2 25
$70.8M
$75.6M
Q1 25
$71.9M
$77.3M
Q4 24
$67.9M
$78.3M
Q3 24
$67.3M
$79.1M
Q2 24
$66.9M
$74.9M
Q1 24
$66.7M
$80.7M
Net Profit
BFS
BFS
RPAY
RPAY
Q4 25
$6.5M
$-140.1M
Q3 25
$10.5M
$-6.4M
Q2 25
$10.7M
$-102.3M
Q1 25
$9.8M
$-7.9M
Q4 24
$8.1M
$-4.1M
Q3 24
$14.5M
$3.2M
Q2 24
$14.4M
$-4.1M
Q1 24
$13.6M
$-5.2M
Gross Margin
BFS
BFS
RPAY
RPAY
Q4 25
74.2%
Q3 25
74.4%
Q2 25
75.7%
Q1 25
75.9%
Q4 24
76.3%
Q3 24
73.6%
77.8%
Q2 24
74.2%
78.2%
Q1 24
72.8%
76.2%
Operating Margin
BFS
BFS
RPAY
RPAY
Q4 25
65.4%
-182.2%
Q3 25
69.1%
-3.9%
Q2 25
68.7%
-138.7%
Q1 25
66.5%
-4.7%
Q4 24
82.9%
-1.5%
Q3 24
72.8%
-0.9%
Q2 24
75.0%
-4.6%
Q1 24
72.4%
-3.1%
Net Margin
BFS
BFS
RPAY
RPAY
Q4 25
8.7%
-178.3%
Q3 25
14.6%
-8.3%
Q2 25
15.1%
-135.2%
Q1 25
13.6%
-10.3%
Q4 24
11.9%
-5.3%
Q3 24
21.5%
4.1%
Q2 24
21.6%
-5.4%
Q1 24
20.4%
-6.5%
EPS (diluted)
BFS
BFS
RPAY
RPAY
Q4 25
$0.15
$-1.68
Q3 25
$0.32
$-0.08
Q2 25
$0.33
$-1.15
Q1 25
$0.29
$-0.09
Q4 24
$0.22
$-0.04
Q3 24
$0.48
$0.03
Q2 24
$0.48
$-0.04
Q1 24
$0.45
$-0.06

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
BFS
BFS
RPAY
RPAY
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$8.7M
$115.7M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$468.4M
$280.1M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$307.8M
$484.4M
Total Assets
$2.2B
$1.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.52×
0.58×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
BFS
BFS
RPAY
RPAY
Q4 25
$8.7M
$115.7M
Q3 25
$11.8M
$95.7M
Q2 25
$5.3M
$162.6M
Q1 25
$6.5M
$165.5M
Q4 24
$10.3M
$189.5M
Q3 24
$7.2M
$168.7M
Q2 24
$6.9M
$147.1M
Q1 24
$7.1M
$128.3M
Total Debt
BFS
BFS
RPAY
RPAY
Q4 25
$468.4M
$280.1M
Q3 25
$1.6B
$279.5M
Q2 25
$1.6B
$279.0M
Q1 25
$1.5B
$497.6M
Q4 24
$455.8M
$496.8M
Q3 24
$1.5B
$496.2M
Q2 24
$1.4B
$435.6M
Q1 24
$1.4B
$434.9M
Stockholders' Equity
BFS
BFS
RPAY
RPAY
Q4 25
$307.8M
$484.4M
Q3 25
$316.6M
$616.9M
Q2 25
$322.4M
$633.7M
Q1 25
$328.4M
$755.7M
Q4 24
$335.8M
$761.3M
Q3 24
$341.8M
$754.7M
Q2 24
$345.7M
$815.4M
Q1 24
$347.1M
$813.8M
Total Assets
BFS
BFS
RPAY
RPAY
Q4 25
$2.2B
$1.2B
Q3 25
$2.2B
$1.3B
Q2 25
$2.1B
$1.4B
Q1 25
$2.1B
$1.5B
Q4 24
$2.1B
$1.6B
Q3 24
$2.1B
$1.6B
Q2 24
$2.1B
$1.5B
Q1 24
$2.0B
$1.5B
Debt / Equity
BFS
BFS
RPAY
RPAY
Q4 25
1.52×
0.58×
Q3 25
5.02×
0.45×
Q2 25
4.85×
0.44×
Q1 25
4.70×
0.66×
Q4 24
1.36×
0.65×
Q3 24
4.37×
0.66×
Q2 24
4.17×
0.53×
Q1 24
4.06×
0.53×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
BFS
BFS
RPAY
RPAY
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$99.8M
$23.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$23.2M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
29.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
15.35×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$90.7M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
BFS
BFS
RPAY
RPAY
Q4 25
$99.8M
$23.3M
Q3 25
$20.6M
$32.2M
Q2 25
$26.6M
$33.1M
Q1 25
$30.4M
$2.5M
Q4 24
$121.2M
$34.3M
Q3 24
$26.5M
$60.1M
Q2 24
$32.1M
$31.0M
Q1 24
$33.8M
$24.8M
Free Cash Flow
BFS
BFS
RPAY
RPAY
Q4 25
$23.2M
Q3 25
$32.1M
Q2 25
$33.0M
Q1 25
$2.4M
Q4 24
$34.0M
Q3 24
$-28.3M
$59.8M
Q2 24
$-12.5M
$30.5M
Q1 24
$-11.7M
$24.7M
FCF Margin
BFS
BFS
RPAY
RPAY
Q4 25
29.6%
Q3 25
41.3%
Q2 25
43.6%
Q1 25
3.0%
Q4 24
43.5%
Q3 24
-42.1%
75.6%
Q2 24
-18.7%
40.7%
Q1 24
-17.6%
30.6%
Capex Intensity
BFS
BFS
RPAY
RPAY
Q4 25
0.1%
Q3 25
0.2%
Q2 25
0.1%
Q1 25
0.2%
Q4 24
0.3%
Q3 24
81.5%
0.3%
Q2 24
66.7%
0.6%
Q1 24
68.3%
0.1%
Cash Conversion
BFS
BFS
RPAY
RPAY
Q4 25
15.35×
Q3 25
1.97×
Q2 25
2.48×
Q1 25
3.10×
Q4 24
14.98×
Q3 24
1.83×
18.52×
Q2 24
2.22×
Q1 24
2.48×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

BFS
BFS

Segment breakdown not available.

RPAY
RPAY

Sales Channel Directly To Consumer$69.4M88%
Other$6.8M9%
Sales Channel Through Intermediary$2.3M3%

Related Comparisons