vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SAUL CENTERS, INC. (BFS) and TrueCar, Inc. (TRUE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SAUL CENTERS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($75.1M vs $43.2M, roughly 1.7× TrueCar, Inc.). TrueCar, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 11.6% vs 8.7%, a 2.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SAUL CENTERS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.6% vs -7.2%). Over the past eight quarters, SAUL CENTERS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (6.2% CAGR vs 2.3%).
Saul Centers, Inc. is a self-administered real estate investment trust (REIT) headquartered in the United States. It primarily owns, operates, and develops high-quality shopping centers, mixed-use properties, and multifamily residential assets, with its core portfolio concentrated in the Washington D.C. metropolitan area and other select high-growth U.S. regional markets.
TrueCar, Inc. is an American car retailing website company headquartered in Santa Monica, California. It also maintains a sales office in Austin, Texas.
BFS vs TRUE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $75.1M | $43.2M |
| Net Profit | $6.5M | $5.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 65.4% | -17.0% |
| Net Margin | 8.7% | 11.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.6% | -7.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -19.6% | 185.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.15 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $75.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $72.0M | $43.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.8M | $47.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.9M | $44.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.9M | $46.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.3M | $46.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.9M | $41.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $66.7M | $41.1M |
| Q4 25 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5M | $5.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.7M | $-7.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.8M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.1M | $-5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $-5.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.4M | $-13.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.6M | $-5.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 73.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 74.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 72.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 65.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 69.1% | -17.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 68.7% | -18.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 66.5% | -25.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 82.9% | -15.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 72.8% | -15.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 75.0% | -36.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 72.4% | -18.2% |
| Q4 25 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.6% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.1% | -16.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.6% | -22.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.9% | -12.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.5% | -12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.6% | -32.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.4% | -14.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.15 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.32 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.29 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.22 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.48 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.48 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.45 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.7M | $103.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $468.4M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $307.8M | $114.2M |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $148.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.52× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.8M | $103.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3M | $92.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.5M | $98.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.3M | $111.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $114.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.9M | $128.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $133.7M |
| Q4 25 | $468.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $455.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | $307.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $316.6M | $114.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $322.4M | $106.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $328.4M | $111.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $335.8M | $118.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $341.8M | $128.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $345.7M | $143.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $347.1M | $156.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $148.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $139.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $145.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $159.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $167.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $183.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | $193.5M |
| Q4 25 | 1.52× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.02× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.70× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.37× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.17× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $99.8M | $12.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $11.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 25.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 15.35× | 2.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-19.0K |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $99.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.6M | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.6M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.4M | $-7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $121.2M | $5.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.5M | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.1M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.8M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-10.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-28.3M | $-170.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-12.5M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.7M | $-511.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -10.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -23.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -42.1% | -0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.7% | -8.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -17.6% | -1.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 81.5% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 66.7% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 68.3% | 6.2% |
| Q4 25 | 15.35× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.97× | 2.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.48× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.10× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.83× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.22× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.48× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
