vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) and Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
B&G Foods, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($439.3M vs $395.6M, roughly 1.1× Dolby Laboratories, Inc.). Dolby Laboratories, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 24.0% vs -4.4%, a 28.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dolby Laboratories, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.1% vs -4.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (13.9% CAGR vs -12.8%).
B&G Foods, Inc. is an American branded foods holding company based in Parsippany, New Jersey. The company was formed in 1996 to acquire Bloch & Guggenheimer, a Manhattan-based producer of pickles, relish and condiments which had been founded in 1889.
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is an American technology corporation specializing in audio noise reduction, audio encoding/compression, spatial audio, and high-dynamic-range television (HDR) imaging. Dolby licenses its technologies to consumer electronics manufacturers.
BGS vs DLB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $439.3M | $395.6M |
| Net Profit | $-19.1M | $94.9M |
| Gross Margin | 22.5% | 88.7% |
| Operating Margin | 2.5% | 28.5% |
| Net Margin | -4.4% | 24.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.7% | 7.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -356.5% | 3.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.24 | $0.99 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 26 | — | $395.6M | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $346.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $346.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $439.3M | $307.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $424.4M | $315.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $425.4M | $369.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $551.6M | $357.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $461.1M | $304.8M |
| Q2 26 | — | $94.9M | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $53.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $53.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-19.1M | $49.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.8M | $46.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $835.0K | $91.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-222.4M | $67.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5M | $58.6M |
| Q2 26 | — | 88.7% | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 87.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 87.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.5% | 87.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.5% | 86.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.2% | 90.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.5% | 88.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | 88.8% |
| Q2 26 | — | 28.5% | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.4% | 29.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -46.6% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.1% | 15.2% |
| Q2 26 | — | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.4% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.3% | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -40.3% | 19.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 19.2% |
| Q2 26 | — | $0.99 | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $0.55 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.24 | $0.50 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.12 | $0.48 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.01 | $0.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.81 | $0.70 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.09 | $0.59 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $60.9M | $594.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.0B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $470.7M | $2.6B |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $3.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 4.30× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | — | $594.7M | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $644.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $644.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.9M | $702.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.1M | $699.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.2M | $626.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $50.6M | $520.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.7M | $482.0M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — |
| Q2 26 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $470.7M | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $501.4M | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $513.1M | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $524.8M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $755.3M | $2.5B |
| Q2 26 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $3.1B |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.30× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.97× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.91× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.85× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.75× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-64.6M | $147.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-70.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -16.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $54.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | — | $147.3M | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $54.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $54.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-64.6M | $472.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.8M | $67.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.7M | $174.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.3M | $106.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2M | $327.3M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $50.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-70.7M | $435.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5M | $61.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.4M | $168.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.7M | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-679.0K | $297.2M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.1% | 142.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 19.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | 45.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.0% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.1% | 97.5% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 9.8% |
| Q2 26 | — | 1.55× | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.57× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | 63.17× | 1.91× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.56× | 5.59× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BGS
| Specialty Segment | $150.5M | 34% |
| Meals Segment | $110.0M | 25% |
| Spices And Flavor Solutions Segment | $101.4M | 23% |
| Frozen And Vegetables Segment | $77.4M | 18% |
DLB
| Licensing | $372.2M | 94% |
| Products and services | $23.4M | 6% |
