vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) and Gitlab Inc. (GTLB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

B&G Foods, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($439.3M vs $244.4M, roughly 1.8× Gitlab Inc.). Gitlab Inc. runs the higher net margin — -3.4% vs -4.4%, a 1.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gitlab Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24.6% vs -4.7%). Gitlab Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($28.4M vs $-70.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Gitlab Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (22.1% CAGR vs -12.8%).

B&G Foods, Inc. is an American branded foods holding company based in Parsippany, New Jersey. The company was formed in 1996 to acquire Bloch & Guggenheimer, a Manhattan-based producer of pickles, relish and condiments which had been founded in 1889.

GitLab Inc. is an American company that operates and develops GitLab, an open-core DevOps software package that can develop, secure, and operate software. GitLab includes a distributed version control system based on Git, including features such as access control, bug tracking, software feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project, as well as snippets.

BGS vs GTLB — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
BGS
BGS
1.8× larger
BGS
$439.3M
$244.4M
GTLB
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
GTLB
GTLB
+29.4% gap
GTLB
24.6%
-4.7%
BGS
Higher net margin
GTLB
GTLB
1.0% more per $
GTLB
-3.4%
-4.4%
BGS
More free cash flow
GTLB
GTLB
$99.1M more FCF
GTLB
$28.4M
$-70.7M
BGS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
GTLB
GTLB
Annualised
GTLB
22.1%
-12.8%
BGS

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
BGS
BGS
GTLB
GTLB
Revenue
$439.3M
$244.4M
Net Profit
$-19.1M
$-8.3M
Gross Margin
22.5%
86.8%
Operating Margin
2.5%
-5.1%
Net Margin
-4.4%
-3.4%
Revenue YoY
-4.7%
24.6%
Net Profit YoY
-356.5%
-128.0%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.24
$-0.05

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BGS
BGS
GTLB
GTLB
Q4 25
$244.4M
Q3 25
$439.3M
$236.0M
Q2 25
$424.4M
$214.5M
Q1 25
$425.4M
$211.4M
Q4 24
$551.6M
$196.0M
Q3 24
$461.1M
$182.6M
Q2 24
$444.6M
$169.2M
Q1 24
$475.2M
$163.8M
Net Profit
BGS
BGS
GTLB
GTLB
Q4 25
$-8.3M
Q3 25
$-19.1M
$-9.2M
Q2 25
$-9.8M
$-35.9M
Q1 25
$835.0K
$5.8M
Q4 24
$-222.4M
$29.6M
Q3 24
$7.5M
$12.9M
Q2 24
$3.9M
$-54.6M
Q1 24
$-40.2M
$-36.5M
Gross Margin
BGS
BGS
GTLB
GTLB
Q4 25
86.8%
Q3 25
22.5%
87.9%
Q2 25
20.5%
88.3%
Q1 25
21.2%
89.2%
Q4 24
21.5%
88.7%
Q3 24
22.2%
88.3%
Q2 24
20.7%
88.9%
Q1 24
22.9%
90.2%
Operating Margin
BGS
BGS
GTLB
GTLB
Q4 25
-5.1%
Q3 25
2.5%
-7.8%
Q2 25
5.2%
-16.1%
Q1 25
8.4%
-9.1%
Q4 24
-46.6%
-14.7%
Q3 24
11.1%
-22.5%
Q2 24
9.9%
-31.7%
Q1 24
-3.3%
-21.3%
Net Margin
BGS
BGS
GTLB
GTLB
Q4 25
-3.4%
Q3 25
-4.4%
-3.9%
Q2 25
-2.3%
-16.7%
Q1 25
0.2%
2.7%
Q4 24
-40.3%
15.1%
Q3 24
1.6%
7.1%
Q2 24
0.9%
-32.3%
Q1 24
-8.5%
-22.3%
EPS (diluted)
BGS
BGS
GTLB
GTLB
Q4 25
$-0.05
Q3 25
$-0.24
$-0.06
Q2 25
$-0.12
$-0.22
Q1 25
$0.01
$0.05
Q4 24
$-2.81
$0.18
Q3 24
$0.09
$0.08
Q2 24
$0.05
$-0.35
Q1 24
$-0.51
$-0.23

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
BGS
BGS
GTLB
GTLB
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$60.9M
$224.2M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$2.0B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$470.7M
$922.7M
Total Assets
$2.9B
$1.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
4.30×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
BGS
BGS
GTLB
GTLB
Q4 25
$224.2M
Q3 25
$60.9M
$261.4M
Q2 25
$54.1M
$255.7M
Q1 25
$61.2M
$227.6M
Q4 24
$50.6M
$176.6M
Q3 24
$54.7M
$438.6M
Q2 24
$40.3M
$420.3M
Q1 24
$42.5M
$288.0M
Total Debt
BGS
BGS
GTLB
GTLB
Q4 25
Q3 25
$2.0B
Q2 25
$2.0B
Q1 25
$2.0B
Q4 24
$2.0B
Q3 24
$2.1B
Q2 24
$2.0B
Q1 24
$2.0B
Stockholders' Equity
BGS
BGS
GTLB
GTLB
Q4 25
$922.7M
Q3 25
$470.7M
$866.6M
Q2 25
$501.4M
$808.3M
Q1 25
$513.1M
$775.9M
Q4 24
$524.8M
$724.7M
Q3 24
$755.3M
$642.8M
Q2 24
$765.0M
$567.8M
Q1 24
$781.2M
$571.2M
Total Assets
BGS
BGS
GTLB
GTLB
Q4 25
$1.6B
Q3 25
$2.9B
$1.5B
Q2 25
$2.9B
$1.4B
Q1 25
$3.0B
$1.4B
Q4 24
$3.0B
$1.3B
Q3 24
$3.4B
$1.4B
Q2 24
$3.4B
$1.3B
Q1 24
$3.4B
$1.3B
Debt / Equity
BGS
BGS
GTLB
GTLB
Q4 25
Q3 25
4.30×
Q2 25
3.97×
Q1 25
3.91×
Q4 24
3.85×
Q3 24
2.75×
Q2 24
2.67×
Q1 24
2.61×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
BGS
BGS
GTLB
GTLB
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-64.6M
$31.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-70.7M
$28.4M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-16.1%
11.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.4%
1.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$54.8M
$242.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
BGS
BGS
GTLB
GTLB
Q4 25
$31.4M
Q3 25
$-64.6M
$49.4M
Q2 25
$17.8M
$106.3M
Q1 25
$52.7M
$63.2M
Q4 24
$80.3M
$-177.0M
Q3 24
$4.2M
$11.7M
Q2 24
$11.3M
$38.1M
Q1 24
$35.1M
$24.9M
Free Cash Flow
BGS
BGS
GTLB
GTLB
Q4 25
$28.4M
Q3 25
$-70.7M
$46.5M
Q2 25
$11.5M
$105.4M
Q1 25
$42.4M
$62.1M
Q4 24
$71.7M
$-178.1M
Q3 24
$-679.0K
$10.8M
Q2 24
$5.2M
$37.4M
Q1 24
$27.5M
$24.5M
FCF Margin
BGS
BGS
GTLB
GTLB
Q4 25
11.6%
Q3 25
-16.1%
19.7%
Q2 25
2.7%
49.1%
Q1 25
10.0%
29.4%
Q4 24
13.0%
-90.8%
Q3 24
-0.1%
5.9%
Q2 24
1.2%
22.1%
Q1 24
5.8%
15.0%
Capex Intensity
BGS
BGS
GTLB
GTLB
Q4 25
1.2%
Q3 25
1.4%
1.2%
Q2 25
1.5%
0.4%
Q1 25
2.4%
0.5%
Q4 24
1.6%
0.5%
Q3 24
1.0%
0.5%
Q2 24
1.4%
0.4%
Q1 24
1.6%
0.2%
Cash Conversion
BGS
BGS
GTLB
GTLB
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
63.17×
10.89×
Q4 24
-5.99×
Q3 24
0.56×
0.90×
Q2 24
2.87×
Q1 24

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

BGS
BGS

Specialty Segment$150.5M34%
Meals Segment$110.0M25%
Spices And Flavor Solutions Segment$101.4M23%
Frozen And Vegetables Segment$77.4M18%

GTLB
GTLB

Subscription And Circulation$146.4M60%
Subscription Software As A Service$76.9M31%
License$15.5M6%
Professional Services And Other$5.6M2%

Related Comparisons