vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BGSF, INC. (BGSF) and MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($40.6M vs $22.0M, roughly 1.8× BGSF, INC.). BGSF, INC. runs the higher net margin — -5.3% vs -19.9%, a 14.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BGSF, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-9.4% vs -20.7%). BGSF, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.7M vs $-4.8M). Over the past eight quarters, MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp's revenue compounded faster (-3.4% CAGR vs -5.3%).
BGSF Inc. is a leading U.S.-headquartered workforce solutions firm that provides tailored staffing, talent recruitment, and end-to-end workforce management services. It serves core segments including information technology, healthcare, professional administration, light industrial, and creative industries, catering to small, mid-sized and large enterprise clients across North America.
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
BGSF vs MX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $22.0M | $40.6M |
| Net Profit | $-1.2M | $-8.1M |
| Gross Margin | 35.0% | 9.3% |
| Operating Margin | -17.6% | -26.1% |
| Net Margin | -5.3% | -19.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.4% | -20.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -18.2% | 50.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.12 | $-0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $22.0M | $40.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.9M | $45.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.5M | $47.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.9M | $44.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.3M | $51.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.8M | $55.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.7M | $46.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.5M | $43.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.8M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.7M | $323.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-722.0K | $-8.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-981.0K | $-16.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-804.0K | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-761.0K | $-13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-792.0K | $-15.4M |
| Q4 25 | 35.0% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.9% | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.2% | 20.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.9% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.9% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.3% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.1% | 14.6% |
| Q4 25 | -17.6% | -26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.5% | -25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.8% | -15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | -14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -15.7% | -12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.4% | -8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.7% | -12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | -21.6% |
| Q4 25 | -5.3% | -19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -21.6% | -28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.5% | -19.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | -31.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.7% | -17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.0% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.2% | -35.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.12 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.52 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.34 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.06 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.07 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $103.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $48.1M | $248.3M |
| Total Assets | $57.8M | $351.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $103.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.2M | $108.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $113.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | $132.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.0K | $138.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $262 | $151.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $226 | $162.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $50 | $171.6M |
| Q4 25 | $48.1M | $248.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.7M | $255.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.3M | $270.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.8M | $269.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.3M | $276.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.9M | $299.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.2M | $305.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $83.6M | $321.9M |
| Q4 25 | $57.8M | $351.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.6M | $359.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $149.7M | $370.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $152.3M | $373.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $150.1M | $379.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $157.3K | $411.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $159.8K | $412.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $170.6K | $426.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.7M | $5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.7M | $-4.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | -11.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 25.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-16.0K | $-54.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | $162.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | $-25.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.4M | $-4.0M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $-37.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | $-15.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9M | $-4.6M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | -11.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.1% | -16.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.1% | -77.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | -10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.7% | -28.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.5% | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.1% | -10.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -77.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BGSF
| Contract Field Talent | $21.4M | 97% |
| Other | $595.0K | 3% |
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
