vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BENCHMARK ELECTRONICS INC (BHE) and Brookfield Infrastructure Corp (BIPC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Infrastructure Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($866.0M vs $725.8M, roughly 1.2× BENCHMARK ELECTRONICS INC). On growth, BENCHMARK ELECTRONICS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.2% vs -4.6%).
Benchmark Electronics Inc is an EMS, ODM, and OEM company based in Tempe, Arizona in the Phoenix metropolitan area. It provides contract manufacturing services.
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Canada, that engages in the acquisition and management of infrastructure assets on a global basis.
BHE vs BIPC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $725.8M | $866.0M |
| Net Profit | — | $-309.0M |
| Gross Margin | 10.2% | 65.0% |
| Operating Margin | 2.8% | 62.7% |
| Net Margin | — | -35.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.2% | -4.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -148.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.16 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $725.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $702.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $665.7M | $866.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $654.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $683.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $680.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $686.7M | $908.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $710.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $972.0K | $-309.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.5M | $643.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.7% | 65.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.9% | 63.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 62.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 61.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | -35.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 70.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.39 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.43 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.42 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.43 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.38 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $322.1M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $206.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.1B | $2.2B |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $23.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.19× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $322.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $285.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $264.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $355.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $315.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $324.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $309.3M | $466.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $296.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $206.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $203.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $268.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $250.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $272.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $283.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $310.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $23.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $23.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.19× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.19× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.24× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.25× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.29× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $58.7M | $478.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $48.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $88.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $58.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.8M | $478.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $55.8M | $511.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $48.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $48.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.57× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.90× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.65× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.59× | 0.79× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.46× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BHE
| Other | $384.9M | 53% |
| Aerospace And Defense Sector | $107.6M | 15% |
| Healthcare Sector | $81.7M | 11% |
| Advanced Computing And Communications Sector | $70.0M | 10% |
| Semi Cap Sector | $45.4M | 6% |
| Industrial Sector | $25.2M | 3% |
| Intersegment Sales | $11.0M | 2% |
BIPC
Segment breakdown not available.