vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. (BHRB) and Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Latham Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($100.0M vs $86.5M, roughly 1.2× Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.). Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. runs the higher net margin — 34.9% vs -7.0%, a 42.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Latham Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.5% vs 4.9%). Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($96.2M vs $14.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (81.1% CAGR vs -4.9%).
Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp is a U.S.-based regional financial holding company, offering personal and commercial banking, wealth management, residential mortgage lending, and small business financing services. Its core market covers Virginia and adjacent Mid-Atlantic regions, serving retail consumers, SMEs, and high-net-worth clients.
Latham & Watkins LLP is an American multinational law firm. Founded in 1934 in Los Angeles, California, it is known for its litigation, corporate, and regulatory law practices.
BHRB vs SWIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $86.5M | $100.0M |
| Net Profit | $30.2M | $-7.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 43.8% | -10.7% |
| Net Margin | 34.9% | -7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.9% | 14.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 52.8% | 76.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.98 | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $86.5M | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.4M | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.1M | $172.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.0M | $111.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.5M | $87.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.8M | $150.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.3M | $160.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.4M | $110.6M |
| Q4 25 | $30.2M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.0M | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.9M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.2M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.8M | $-29.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.6M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.9M | $13.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $-7.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 32.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 27.7% |
| Q4 25 | 43.8% | -10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.3% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.7% | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.6% | -4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.6% | -14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.2% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -27.5% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.3% | -1.9% |
| Q4 25 | 34.9% | -7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.1% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.3% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.8% | -5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | -33.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.0% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.4% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.8% | -7.1% |
| Q4 25 | $1.98 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.97 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.97 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.80 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.72 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.82 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.41 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.69 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $279.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $854.6M | $405.9M |
| Total Assets | $7.9B | $823.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.69× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $279.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $281.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $281.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $306.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $281.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $282.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $282.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $282.8M |
| Q4 25 | $854.6M | $405.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $822.2M | $408.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $780.0M | $398.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $758.0M | $381.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $730.2M | $387.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $738.1M | $416.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $693.1M | $408.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $319.3M | $391.8M |
| Q4 25 | $7.9B | $823.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9B | $844.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1B | $822.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8B | $824.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8B | $794.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9B | $853.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.8B | $830.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.7B | $808.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.72× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $107.9M | $23.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $96.2M | $14.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 111.2% | 14.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.5% | 9.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.57× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $164.1M | $38.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $107.9M | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.3M | $51.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.0K | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.6M | $-46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.8M | $6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.8M | $37.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-46.0M | $52.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $-34.5M |
| Q4 25 | $96.2M | $14.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.4M | $45.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4M | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.9M | $-50.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.2M | $-98.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.0M | $33.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-47.0M | $47.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6M | $-39.9M |
| Q4 25 | 111.2% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.5% | 27.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.9% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.2% | -45.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 98.5% | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.0% | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -67.8% | 29.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | -36.0% |
| Q4 25 | 13.5% | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.7% | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | 3.57× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.31× | 6.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | 2.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.38× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.33× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.73× | 6.32× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.95× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.36× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BHRB
Segment breakdown not available.
SWIM
| In Ground Swimming Pools | $50.2M | 50% |
| Covers | $37.0M | 37% |
| Liners | $12.7M | 13% |
