vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Infrastructure Corp (BIPC) and Fabrinet (FN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Fabrinet is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $866.0M, roughly 1.3× Brookfield Infrastructure Corp). Fabrinet runs the higher net margin — 9.9% vs -35.7%, a 45.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fabrinet posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.9% vs -4.6%).
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Canada, that engages in the acquisition and management of infrastructure assets on a global basis.
FabrinetFNEarnings & Financial Report
Below is a list of companies having stocks that are included in the S&P MidCap 400 stock market index. The index, maintained by S&P Dow Jones Indices, comprises the common stocks of 400 mid-cap, mostly American, companies. Although called the S&P 400, the index sometimes contains more than 400 stocks when it includes two or more share classes of stock from one of its component companies.
BIPC vs FN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $866.0M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $-309.0M | $112.6M |
| Gross Margin | 65.0% | 12.2% |
| Operating Margin | 62.7% | 10.1% |
| Net Margin | -35.7% | 9.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.6% | 35.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -148.1% | 30.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $3.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $978.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $866.0M | $909.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $871.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $833.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $804.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $908.0M | $753.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $731.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $112.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $95.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-309.0M | $87.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $81.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $86.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $77.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $643.0M | $81.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $80.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.0% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.8% | 12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.7% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 61.9% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -35.7% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.8% | 10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 11.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.66 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.25 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.22 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | $960.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $2.2B |
| Total Assets | $23.9B | $3.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $960.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $968.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $934.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $950.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $934.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $908.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $466.0M | $858.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $794.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.9B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $478.0M | $46.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-5.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $102.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $46.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $102.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $478.0M | $55.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $74.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $115.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $83.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $511.0M | $83.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $100.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-5.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $57.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $45.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $94.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $62.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $70.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $87.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 11.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.07× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.79× | 1.02× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.25× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BIPC
Segment breakdown not available.
FN
| Optical Communications | $832.6M | 73% |
| Non Optical Communications | $300.3M | 27% |
