vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Infrastructure Corp (BIPC) and Frontdoor, Inc. (FTDR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Infrastructure Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($866.0M vs $451.0M, roughly 1.9× Frontdoor, Inc.). Frontdoor, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 9.1% vs -35.7%, a 44.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Frontdoor, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.9% vs -4.6%).
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Canada, that engages in the acquisition and management of infrastructure assets on a global basis.
Frontdoor, Inc. operates a leading U.S.-focused home services and protection platform. It offers customizable home warranty plans covering repairs and replacements for household appliances, HVAC, plumbing, and electrical systems, plus on-demand access to a network of pre-vetted local service professionals for residential maintenance and repairs.
BIPC vs FTDR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $866.0M | $451.0M |
| Net Profit | $-309.0M | $41.0M |
| Gross Margin | 65.0% | 55.0% |
| Operating Margin | 62.7% | — |
| Net Margin | -35.7% | 9.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.6% | 5.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -148.1% | 10.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $451.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $432.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $618.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $866.0M | $617.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $426.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $383.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $540.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $908.0M | $542.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $41.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $106.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-309.0M | $111.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $37.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $100.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $643.0M | $92.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 55.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 49.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 57.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.0% | 57.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 55.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 48.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 56.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.8% | 56.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.7% | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 61.9% | 22.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -35.7% | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.8% | 17.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.57 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.42 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.48 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.30 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.18 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | $603.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $230.0M |
| Total Assets | $23.9B | $2.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 5.07× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $603.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $566.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $563.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $562.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $506.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $436.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $375.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $466.0M | $419.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $565.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $569.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $230.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $242.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $316.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $254.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $198.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $239.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $261.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $214.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.9B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.7B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.07× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.73× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.64× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.56× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.88× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.90× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.66× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $478.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $114.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 25.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $387.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $101.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $64.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $478.0M | $127.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $124.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $58.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $25.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $511.0M | $103.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $114.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $95.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $58.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $120.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $117.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $50.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $91.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 25.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 22.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 101.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.79× | 1.12× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
