vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Infrastructure Corp (BIPC) and UNISYS CORP (UIS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Infrastructure Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($866.0M vs $574.5M, roughly 1.5× UNISYS CORP). UNISYS CORP runs the higher net margin — 3.3% vs -35.7%, a 38.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, UNISYS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.3% vs -4.6%).
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Canada, that engages in the acquisition and management of infrastructure assets on a global basis.
Unisys Corporation is a technology company founded in 1986 and headquartered in Blue Bell, Pennsylvania. The company provides cloud, AI, digital workplace, logistics, and enterprise computing services.
BIPC vs UIS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $866.0M | $574.5M |
| Net Profit | $-309.0M | $18.7M |
| Gross Margin | 65.0% | 33.9% |
| Operating Margin | 62.7% | 13.3% |
| Net Margin | -35.7% | 3.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.6% | 5.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -148.1% | -37.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $574.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $460.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $866.0M | $483.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $432.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $545.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $497.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $908.0M | $478.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $487.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $18.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-308.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-309.0M | $-20.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-29.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $30.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-61.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $643.0M | $-12.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-149.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 33.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.0% | 26.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.8% | 27.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 27.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.7% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 61.9% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -67.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -35.7% | -4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -6.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.8% | -2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -30.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-4.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.28 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.42 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.45 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.89 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.18 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | $413.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $729.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $-282.6M |
| Total Assets | $23.9B | $1.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $413.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $321.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $300.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $393.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $376.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $373.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $466.0M | $344.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $382.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $729.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $723.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $692.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $488.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $488.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $488.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $489.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $488.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-282.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-300.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $-221.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-267.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-283.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-202.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $-174.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-158.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $478.0M | $104.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $97.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 16.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 5.61× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-170.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $104.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $38.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $478.0M | $-316.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $33.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $76.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $32.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $511.0M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $23.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $97.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $32.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-324.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $24.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $66.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-6.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $17.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 16.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -67.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.55× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.79× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
