vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BK Technologies Corp (BKTI) and Dominari Holdings Inc. (DOMH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dominari Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($30.1M vs $21.5M, roughly 1.4× BK Technologies Corp). BK Technologies Corp runs the higher net margin — 19.7% vs -438.1%, a 457.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dominari Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (220.4% vs 20.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Dominari Holdings Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (369.1% CAGR vs -21.6%).
BK Technologies Corp designs, manufactures and sells analog and digital two-way radio communications equipment and related accessories. It serves public safety departments, first responders, government agencies and commercial clients primarily across North America, focusing on reliable, mission-critical communication solutions.
BKTI vs DOMH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $21.5M | $30.1M |
| Net Profit | $4.2M | $-131.8M |
| Gross Margin | 50.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 19.7% | -8.9% |
| Net Margin | 19.7% | -438.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.0% | 220.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.6% | -12426.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.06 | $-6.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $21.5M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.4M | $50.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.2M | $34.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.1M | $8.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.9M | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.2M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.3M | $6.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4M |
| Q4 25 | $4.2M | $-131.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4M | $125.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7M | $16.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $-32.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | $-6.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-5.4M |
| Q4 25 | 50.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 47.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.7% | -8.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.8% | -3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.9% | -57.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | -394.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.9% | -79.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.0% | -44.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -205.2% |
| Q4 25 | 19.7% | -438.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.1% | 246.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.7% | 48.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.2% | -400.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.4% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | -104.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.2% | -99.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -398.0% |
| Q4 25 | $1.06 | $-6.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.87 | $7.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.96 | $1.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.55 | $-3.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.96 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.63 | $-0.67 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.47 | $-1.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.91 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $22.8M | $80.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $44.7M | $69.4M |
| Total Assets | $63.8M | $112.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $22.8M | $80.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.5M | $176.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.9M | $28.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.9M | $18.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1M | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2M | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0M | $12.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | $44.7M | $69.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.0M | $210.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.8M | $88.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.4M | $42.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $39.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.0M | $38.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.4M | $42.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $47.7M |
| Q4 25 | $63.8M | $112.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.9M | $223.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.4M | $109.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.1M | $52.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.5M | $47.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.4M | $43.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.9M | $49.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $52.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.0M | $22.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 13.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.71× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $18.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | $22.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.4M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $-353.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8M | $-16.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1M | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-8.6M |
| Q4 25 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.04× | -0.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.04× | -0.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.04× | -15.65× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.46× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BKTI
Segment breakdown not available.
DOMH
| Chief Operating Decision Maker | $30.1M | 100% |
| Commissions | $458.0K | 2% |
