vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BK Technologies Corp (BKTI) and Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BK Technologies Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($21.5M vs $13.3M, roughly 1.6× Laird Superfood, Inc.). BK Technologies Corp runs the higher net margin — 19.7% vs -13.2%, a 32.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BK Technologies Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.0% vs 15.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs -21.6%).
BK Technologies Corp designs, manufactures and sells analog and digital two-way radio communications equipment and related accessories. It serves public safety departments, first responders, government agencies and commercial clients primarily across North America, focusing on reliable, mission-critical communication solutions.
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
BKTI vs LSF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $21.5M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | $4.2M | $-1.8M |
| Gross Margin | 50.5% | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | 19.7% | -13.5% |
| Net Margin | 19.7% | -13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.0% | 15.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.6% | -341.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.06 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $21.5M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.4M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.2M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.1M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.9M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.2M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.3M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | $4.2M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4M | $-975.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7M | $-362.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $-156.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $-398.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4M | $-166.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | $-239.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | 50.5% | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.9% | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 47.4% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.0% | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.2% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.8% | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.3% | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 40.0% |
| Q4 25 | 19.7% | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.8% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.9% | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.3% | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.9% | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.0% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | 19.7% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.1% | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.7% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.2% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.4% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.2% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $1.06 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.87 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.96 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.55 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.96 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.63 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.47 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $22.8M | $5.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $44.7M | $11.5M |
| Total Assets | $63.8M | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $22.8M | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.5M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.9M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.9M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1M | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0M | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | $44.7M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.0M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.8M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.4M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.0M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.4M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | $63.8M | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.9M | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.4M | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.1M | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.5M | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.4M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.9M | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $17.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.0M | $68.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 13.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.71× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $18.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | $68.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.4M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8M | $339.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7M | $305.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1M | $642.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-422.3K |
| Q4 25 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.04× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.46× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BKTI
Segment breakdown not available.
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |