vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of TopBuild Corp (BLD) and Gen Digital (GEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TopBuild Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.2× Gen Digital). Gen Digital runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs 7.0%, a 8.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gen Digital posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.5% vs 13.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Gen Digital's revenue compounded faster (13.2% CAGR vs 7.8%).
HashiCorp, Inc. is an American software company with a freemium business model based in San Francisco, California. HashiCorp provides tools and products that enable developers, operators and security professionals to provision, secure, run and connect cloud-computing infrastructure. It was founded in 2012 by Mitchell Hashimoto and Armon Dadgar. The company name HashiCorp is a portmanteau of co-founder last name Hashimoto and Corporation.
Gen Digital Inc. is a multinational software company co-headquartered in both Tempe, Arizona (USA) and Prague, Czech Republic (EU). The company provides cybersecurity software, financial technology, and services. Gen is a Fortune 500 company and a member of the S&P 500 stock-market index. It is listed at both NASDAQ and Prague Stock Exchange. Its portfolio includes Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, ReputationDefender, MoneyLion and CCleaner.
BLD vs GEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $104.5M | $192.0M |
| Gross Margin | 27.2% | 78.4% |
| Operating Margin | 12.1% | 34.9% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | 15.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.2% | 28.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -30.6% | 6.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.69 | $0.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $986.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $974.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $965.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $192.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $104.5M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $142.2M | $135.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $151.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $123.4M | $142.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $150.5M | $159.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $169.0M | $161.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $150.7M | $181.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 78.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.2% | 78.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.1% | 78.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.5% | 80.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.9% | 80.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.7% | 80.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.0% | 80.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.1% | 35.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.4% | 35.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.4% | 41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.6% | 37.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.8% | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.4% | 43.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.2% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.5% | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.3% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.0% | 18.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.31 | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.69 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.04 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.32 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.23 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.07 | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.65 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.78 | $0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $184.7M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.8B | $8.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $6.6B | $15.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.23× | 3.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $184.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $842.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $308.8M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $400.3M | $883.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $257.3M | $737.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $463.2M | $644.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $8.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $8.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $15.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.6B | $16.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $16.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | $15.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.7B | $15.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.7B | $15.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9B | $15.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.61× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.23× | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.29× | 3.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.65× | 3.64× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.62× | 3.94× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.66× | 4.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.59× | 4.33× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $176.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $159.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.69× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $696.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $176.7M | $541.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $233.3M | $409.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $152.6M | $473.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $266.2M | $326.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.7M | $158.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.4M | $264.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $159.4M | $535.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $216.2M | $405.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $182.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $139.2M | $470.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $253.7M | $318.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $219.8M | $156.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $74.3M | $262.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | 43.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.5% | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.3% | 46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.0% | 16.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | 27.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.69× | 4.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.64× | 3.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.24× | 3.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.77× | 2.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.42× | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.60× | 1.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BLD
| Distribution Segment | $755.4M | 51% |
| Residential | $557.9M | 38% |
| All Other Products | $91.9M | 6% |
| Glass And Windows | $51.5M | 3% |
| Rain Gutters | $27.1M | 2% |
GEN
| Cyber Safety Platform | $819.0M | 66% |
| Trust Based Solutions | $421.0M | 34% |
| Net Interest Income On Notes Receivable | $4.0M | 0% |