vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Blue Foundry Bancorp (BLFY) and TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC (TACT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Blue Foundry Bancorp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.3M vs $11.5M, roughly 1.2× TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC). On growth, Blue Foundry Bancorp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (34.2% vs 11.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Blue Foundry Bancorp's revenue compounded faster (16.0% CAGR vs 3.5%).
Blue Foundry Bancorp is a regional bank holding company based in New Jersey, United States. It offers a comprehensive range of personal and commercial banking products, including deposit accounts, consumer loans, mortgage services, and business financing solutions, serving local individual consumers and small to medium-sized enterprises.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
BLFY vs TACT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.3M | $11.5M |
| Net Profit | $-3.5M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 47.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | -10.1% |
| Net Margin | -27.4% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 34.2% | 11.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -30.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.18 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $13.3M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.6M | $13.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.0M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.1M | $13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.9M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5M | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.1M | $11.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | $10.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.9M | $15.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.0M | $-143.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.7M | $19.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.0M | $-551.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.3M | $-319.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.8M | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 47.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 49.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 48.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 44.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 48.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 52.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 52.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -12.2% |
| Q4 25 | -27.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -14.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.2% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -42.7% | -5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -23.2% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -28.8% | -9.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.18 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.10 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.13 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.12 | $-0.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.19 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.11 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.13 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $53.1M | $20.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $312.7M | $31.1M |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $44.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $53.1M | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.1M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.9M | $17.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.2M | $14.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.5M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $76.1M | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.3M | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $53.8M | $10.6M |
| Q4 25 | $312.7M | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $314.4M | $31.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $321.3M | $31.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $326.7M | $30.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $332.2M | $30.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $339.3M | $38.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $345.6M | $38.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $350.2M | $38.6M |
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $44.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $45.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $44.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $44.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $50.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $50.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | $51.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-8.0M | $609.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $589.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 5.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $7.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-8.0M | $609.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-255.0K | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.8M | $-161.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.7M | $327.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.1M | $636.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.9M | $-1.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $589.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-171.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.9M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $259.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $499.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.9M | $-1.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.8% | 23.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -49.3% | -14.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 242.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -8.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
