vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CEA Industries Inc. (BNC) and EMBRAER S.A. (EMBJ), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CEA Technologies is an Australian government business enterprise that primarily supplies the Royal Australian Navy. The company was established in 1983. Its phase array radars, which are fitted to the Royal Australian Navy's fleet of warships, are regarded by Australians as the best in the world.
Embraer S.A. is a Brazilian multinational aerospace corporation. It develops and manufactures aircraft and aviation systems, and provides leasing, equipment, and technical support services. Embraer is the third largest producer of civil aircraft worldwide after Boeing and Airbus. The company also has a significant presence in military aviation, ranking among the top 100 defense contractors. It is headquartered in São José dos Campos, São Paulo, with offices and operations in China, the Nether...
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $7.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $713.5K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $390.8K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $234.5K | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $913.6K | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $1.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $283.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-740.4K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-470.3K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-916.6K | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-799.0K | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-693.6K | — |
| Q4 25 | 29.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -18.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -65.8% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -11.4% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 7.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -123.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -150.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -191.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -27.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -393.9% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -88.3% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -66.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3970.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -127.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -149.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -189.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -390.9% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -87.5% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -65.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.36 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.94 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.33 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.94 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.66 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.34 | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-1.19 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-1.03 | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
