vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BioNTech SE (BNTX) and Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BioNTech SE is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $769.2M, roughly 2.0× Construction Partners, Inc.). Construction Partners, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 1.2% vs -1.9%, a 3.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.
BioNTech SE is a German multinational biotechnology company headquartered in Mainz that develops immunotherapies and vaccines, particularly for cancer and infectious diseases.
Alexander Construction Company was a Palm Springs, California, residential development company that built over 2,200 houses in the Coachella Valley of Riverside County, California, between 1955 and 1965.
BNTX vs ROAD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $769.2M |
| Net Profit | $-28.7M | $9.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 12.9% |
| Operating Margin | -3.1% | 4.9% |
| Net Margin | -1.9% | 1.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 34.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 688.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $769.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $809.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $899.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $260.8M | $779.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $571.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $561.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $538.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $517.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $17.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-28.7M | $56.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-386.6M | $44.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $198.1M | $29.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $30.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | 12.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.1% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -192.1% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -148.2% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.9% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.16 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.31 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.79 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.55 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.59 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $76.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $38.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $979.4M |
| Total Assets | — | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.04× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $76.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $104.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $156.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $114.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $101.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $132.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $74.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $56.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $38.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $515.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $979.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $969.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $912.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $853.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $807.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $811.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $573.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $552.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.78× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $147.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 16.10× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $147.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $82.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $112.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $83.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $55.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $40.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $95.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $34.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $47.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $78.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $46.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $78.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $19.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 16.10× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.80× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.98× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.12× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
