vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DMC Global Inc. (BOOM) and ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd (OSW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($242.1M vs $143.5M, roughly 1.7× DMC Global Inc.). ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs -7.8%, a 12.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs -5.8%). ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd produced more free cash flow last quarter ($14.9M vs $9.6M). Over the past eight quarters, ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd's revenue compounded faster (7.1% CAGR vs -7.3%).
DMC Mining Services is a mining services contractor founded in 1980 operating in Canada, the United States, Chile, and Mongolia
BOOM vs OSW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.5M | $242.1M |
| Net Profit | $-11.2M | $12.1M |
| Gross Margin | 17.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -7.8% | 6.8% |
| Net Margin | -7.8% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.8% | 11.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3871.6% | -16.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.60 | $0.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $143.5M | $242.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.5M | $258.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $155.5M | $240.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $159.3M | $219.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $152.4M | $217.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $152.4M | $241.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $171.2M | $224.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $166.9M | $211.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-11.2M | $12.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.1M | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.0K | $19.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $677.0K | $15.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $296.0K | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-101.3M | $21.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0M | $15.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | $21.2M |
| Q4 25 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -7.8% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.5% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -97.7% | 10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | 8.0% |
| Q4 25 | -7.8% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.0% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 7.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -66.5% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 10.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.60 | $0.12 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.24 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.18 | $0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.27 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.24 | $0.15 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.9M | $16.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $50.6M | $84.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $242.1M | $542.6M |
| Total Assets | $635.8M | $707.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.21× | 0.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $31.9M | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.4M | $29.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.4M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.7M | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.3M | $57.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $48.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.6M | $62.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.4M | $65.4M |
| Q4 25 | $50.6M | $84.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.5M | $85.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.7M | $96.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.4M | $97.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.8M | $98.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $74.2M | $98.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $84.1M | $123.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $88.0M | $138.6M |
| Q4 25 | $242.1M | $542.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $253.0M | $552.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $253.9M | $548.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $253.9M | $530.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $251.0M | $554.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $256.5M | $540.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $416.0M | $532.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $409.9M | $515.5M |
| Q4 25 | $635.8M | $707.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $644.1M | $732.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $645.0M | $731.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $670.6M | $708.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $671.3M | $746.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $702.0M | $734.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $869.5M | $756.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $860.0M | $763.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.21× | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.22× | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.23× | 0.18× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.29× | 0.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.28× | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.29× | 0.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.20× | 0.23× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.21× | 0.27× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.2M | $20.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $9.6M | $14.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.7% | 6.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.9% | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $37.0M | $68.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.2M | $20.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.6M | $33.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2M | $20.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5M | $10.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8M | $16.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.0M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3M | $18.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.4M | $15.0M |
| Q4 25 | $9.6M | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.4M | $27.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3M | $17.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $709.0K | $8.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.9M | $27.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-204.0K | $17.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.5M | $13.7M |
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.5% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 7.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.5% | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.1% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.3% | 6.5% |
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 131.43× | 1.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.63× | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.90× | 1.15× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.58× | 1.19× | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.24× | 0.71× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BOOM
| Dyna Energetics Segment | $68.9M | 48% |
| Other | $57.0M | 40% |
| Nobel Clad Segment | $17.7M | 12% |
OSW
| Services | $197.3M | 82% |
| Products | $44.8M | 18% |
