vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DMC Global Inc. (BOOM) and PARK NATIONAL CORP (PRK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PARK NATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($168.3M vs $143.5M, roughly 1.2× DMC Global Inc.). PARK NATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 25.3% vs -7.8%, a 33.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PARK NATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.2% vs -5.8%). PARK NATIONAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($191.9M vs $9.6M). Over the past eight quarters, PARK NATIONAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (4.9% CAGR vs -7.3%).
DMC Mining Services is a mining services contractor founded in 1980 operating in Canada, the United States, Chile, and Mongolia
National Retail Systems, Inc. (NRS) includes Keystone Freight Corp. & National Retail Transportation, Inc. (NRT). NRS is an asset based 3PL founded in 1952. It is headquartered in Lyndhurst, New Jersey, United States.
BOOM vs PRK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.5M | $168.3M |
| Net Profit | $-11.2M | $42.6M |
| Gross Margin | 17.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -7.8% | — |
| Net Margin | -7.8% | 25.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.8% | 2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3871.6% | 10.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.60 | $2.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $143.5M | $168.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.5M | $169.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $155.5M | $168.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $159.3M | $157.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $152.4M | $164.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $152.4M | $170.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $171.2M | $157.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $166.9M | $152.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-11.2M | $42.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.1M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.0K | $48.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $677.0K | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $296.0K | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-101.3M | $38.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0M | $39.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | $35.2M |
| Q4 25 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -7.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 34.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 32.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -97.7% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | 30.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | -7.8% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.0% | 27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 28.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 23.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -66.5% | 22.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 25.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 23.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.60 | $2.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $2.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.24 | $2.97 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $2.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.18 | $2.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.27 | $2.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.24 | $2.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $2.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.9M | $233.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $50.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $242.1M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $635.8M | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.21× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $31.9M | $233.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.4M | $218.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.4M | $193.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.7M | $237.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.3M | $160.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $201.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.6M | $261.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.4M | $306.1M |
| Q4 25 | $50.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $74.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $84.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $88.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $242.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $253.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $253.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $253.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $251.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $256.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $416.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $409.9M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $635.8M | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $644.1M | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $645.0M | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $670.6M | $9.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $671.3M | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $702.0M | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $869.5M | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $860.0M | $9.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.21× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.2M | $198.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $9.6M | $191.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.7% | 114.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.9% | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $37.0M | $328.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.2M | $198.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.6M | $52.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2M | $49.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5M | $37.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8M | $178.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.0M | $43.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3M | $50.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.4M | $35.0M |
| Q4 25 | $9.6M | $191.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.4M | $51.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3M | $48.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $709.0K | $36.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1M | $169.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.9M | $41.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-204.0K | $49.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.5M | $31.9M |
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | 114.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.5% | 30.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 28.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 23.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 103.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.5% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.1% | 31.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.3% | 20.8% |
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 2.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | 131.43× | 1.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.63× | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.90× | 4.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.58× | 1.29× | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.24× | 0.99× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BOOM
| Dyna Energetics Segment | $68.9M | 48% |
| Other | $57.0M | 40% |
| Nobel Clad Segment | $17.7M | 12% |
PRK
Segment breakdown not available.
