vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DMC Global Inc. (BOOM) and ZIPRECRUITER, INC. (ZIP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DMC Global Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($143.5M vs $111.7M, roughly 1.3× ZIPRECRUITER, INC.). ZIPRECRUITER, INC. runs the higher net margin — -0.7% vs -7.8%, a 7.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ZIPRECRUITER, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.6% vs -5.8%). DMC Global Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($9.6M vs $7.6M). Over the past eight quarters, ZIPRECRUITER, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (-4.4% CAGR vs -7.3%).
DMC Mining Services is a mining services contractor founded in 1980 operating in Canada, the United States, Chile, and Mongolia
ZipRecruiter, Inc. is an American employment marketplace for job seekers and employers.
BOOM vs ZIP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.5M | $111.7M |
| Net Profit | $-11.2M | $-835.0K |
| Gross Margin | 17.1% | 89.1% |
| Operating Margin | -7.8% | 3.6% |
| Net Margin | -7.8% | -0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.8% | 0.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3871.6% | 92.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.60 | $-0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $143.5M | $111.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.5M | $115.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $155.5M | $112.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $159.3M | $110.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $152.4M | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $152.4M | $117.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $171.2M | $123.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $166.9M | $122.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-11.2M | $-835.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.1M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.0K | $-9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $677.0K | $-12.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $296.0K | $-10.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-101.3M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0M | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | $-6.5M |
| Q4 25 | 17.1% | 89.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.7% | 89.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.6% | 89.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.9% | 89.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.8% | 89.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.8% | 89.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.1% | 89.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.4% | 89.1% |
| Q4 25 | -7.8% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | -4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | -5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | -10.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.5% | -3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -97.7% | -2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | -0.7% |
| Q4 25 | -7.8% | -0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.0% | -8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | -8.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | -11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -66.5% | -2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | -5.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.60 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.24 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.18 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.27 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.24 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.9M | $188.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $50.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $242.1M | $-77.2M |
| Total Assets | $635.8M | $569.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.21× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $31.9M | $188.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.4M | $211.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.4M | $203.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.7M | $221.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.3M | $218.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $225.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.6M | $271.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.4M | $282.5M |
| Q4 25 | $50.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $74.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $84.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $88.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $242.1M | $-77.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $253.0M | $-76.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $253.9M | $-65.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $253.9M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $251.0M | $13.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $256.5M | $13.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $416.0M | $24.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $409.9M | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | $635.8M | $569.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $644.1M | $573.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $645.0M | $592.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $670.6M | $629.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $671.3M | $664.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $702.0M | $652.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $869.5M | $665.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $860.0M | $662.4M |
| Q4 25 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.21× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.2M | $7.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $9.6M | $7.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.7% | 6.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.9% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $37.0M | $9.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.2M | $7.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.6M | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2M | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5M | $-9.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8M | $12.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.0M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3M | $21.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.4M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | $9.6M | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.4M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3M | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $709.0K | $-10.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1M | $12.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.9M | $9.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-204.0K | $21.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.5M | $1.9M |
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | -9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.5% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.1% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.3% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 131.43× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.63× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.90× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.58× | 3.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.24× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BOOM
| Dyna Energetics Segment | $68.9M | 48% |
| Other | $57.0M | 40% |
| Nobel Clad Segment | $17.7M | 12% |
ZIP
| License | $84.3M | 75% |
| Services | $27.4M | 25% |
