vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (SFBS) and ZIPRECRUITER, INC. (ZIP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($159.0M vs $111.7M, roughly 1.4× ZIPRECRUITER, INC.). ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 52.2% vs -0.7%, a 52.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (17.7% CAGR vs -4.4%).
ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. is a U.S.-based bank holding company operating full-service banking locations primarily across the Southeastern United States. It offers a full suite of commercial banking, consumer banking, wealth management, and mortgage lending services to small and medium-sized businesses, professional clients, and individual consumers.
ZipRecruiter, Inc. is an American employment marketplace for job seekers and employers.
SFBS vs ZIP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $159.0M | $111.7M |
| Net Profit | $83.0M | $-835.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 89.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 3.6% |
| Net Margin | 52.2% | -0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 0.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 31.2% | 92.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.52 | $-0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $159.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $162.2M | $111.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $136.3M | $115.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $132.1M | $112.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.8M | $110.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $131.9M | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $123.7M | $117.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $114.8M | $123.7M |
| Q1 26 | $83.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $86.4M | $-835.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.6M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.4M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.2M | $-12.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.2M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.9M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.1M | $7.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 89.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 89.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 89.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 89.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 89.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 89.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 89.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 66.3% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.8% | -4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 58.0% | -5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.0% | -10.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.2% | -3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 58.5% | -2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 58.0% | 7.6% |
| Q1 26 | 52.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 59.0% | -0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 48.1% | -8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.5% | -8.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.0% | -11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.9% | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.4% | -2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.4% | 5.7% |
| Q1 26 | $1.52 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.58 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.20 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.12 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.16 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.10 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.95 | $0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8B | $188.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $-77.2M |
| Total Assets | $18.2B | $569.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $188.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $211.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $203.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $221.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $218.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $225.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $271.7M |
| Q1 26 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $-77.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $-76.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $-65.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $-11.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $13.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $13.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $24.4M |
| Q1 26 | $18.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $17.7B | $569.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.6B | $573.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.4B | $592.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.6B | $629.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.4B | $664.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.4B | $652.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0B | $665.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $7.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $7.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 6.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $9.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $355.2M | $7.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $140.9M | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.6M | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.0M | $-9.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $252.9M | $12.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.0M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.3M | $21.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-10.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.11× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.15× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.10× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.76× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.88× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.93× | 3.12× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SFBS
| Net Interest Income | $148.1M | 93% |
| Noninterest Income | $10.8M | 7% |
ZIP
| License | $84.3M | 75% |
| Services | $27.4M | 25% |
