vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Borr Drilling Ltd (BORR) and IDACORP INC (IDA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IDACORP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($360.1M vs $267.7M, roughly 1.3× Borr Drilling Ltd). Borr Drilling Ltd runs the higher net margin — 13.1% vs 12.1%, a 1.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Borr Drilling Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.5% vs -4.2%).
Borr Drilling Ltd is a global offshore drilling contractor owning and operating a modern fleet of high-spec jack-up rigs. It offers drilling services to oil and gas exploration and production firms, with main operations across the North Sea, Southeast Asia, Middle East, and West Africa for shallow-water and marginal field projects.
IDACORP, Inc is an electricity holding company, incorporated in Idaho with headquarters in Boise. It comprises Idaho Power Company, IDACORP Financial and Ida-West Energy. It was formed on October 1, 1998.
BORR vs IDA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $267.7M | $360.1M |
| Net Profit | $35.1M | $43.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 36.0% | 14.9% |
| Net Margin | 13.1% | 12.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.5% | -4.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.7% | 15.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.14 | $0.78 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $360.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $526.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $267.7M | $449.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $411.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $375.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $532.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $271.9M | $442.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $417.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $43.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $124.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | $95.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $59.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $37.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $113.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.7M | $89.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $48.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.0% | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.4% | 23.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 11.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | 21.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 20.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 11.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.78 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | $1.76 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.72 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $1.71 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.95 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $92.4M | $215.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $3.6B |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $10.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.93× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $215.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $333.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.4M | $474.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $634.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $368.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $427.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.3M | $169.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $157.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $999.2M | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | $10.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $8.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $8.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.92× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.3M | $137.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-216.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -60.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 98.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.18× | 3.16× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-577.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $137.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $176.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $124.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $136.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $201.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | $146.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $109.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-216.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-127.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-156.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-77.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-48.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-16.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-199.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-150.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | -60.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -24.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -34.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -18.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -13.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -45.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -36.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 98.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 55.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 74.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 49.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 49.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 78.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 62.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.16× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | 1.85× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.08× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.60× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.78× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | 1.63× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.28× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BORR
| Transferred Over Time | $256.6M | 96% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $11.1M | 4% |
IDA
| Retailrevenues | $323.0M | 90% |
| Transmissionserviceswheeling | $18.6M | 5% |
| Energyefficiencyprogramrevenues | $11.7M | 3% |
| Wholesaleenergysales | $10.5M | 3% |
| Otherrevenues | $9.5M | 3% |
