vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Borr Drilling Ltd (BORR) and BRC Group Holdings, Inc. (RILY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Borr Drilling Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($267.7M vs $188.3M, roughly 1.4× BRC Group Holdings, Inc.). BRC Group Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 47.9% vs 13.1%, a 34.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Borr Drilling Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.5% vs -21.9%).
Borr Drilling Ltd is a global offshore drilling contractor owning and operating a modern fleet of high-spec jack-up rigs. It offers drilling services to oil and gas exploration and production firms, with main operations across the North Sea, Southeast Asia, Middle East, and West Africa for shallow-water and marginal field projects.
BORR vs RILY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $267.7M | $188.3M |
| Net Profit | $35.1M | $90.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 79.5% |
| Operating Margin | 36.0% | 32.3% |
| Net Margin | 13.1% | 47.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.5% | -21.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.7% | 1710.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.14 | $2.78 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $188.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $215.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $267.7M | $188.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $197.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $241.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $225.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $271.9M | $256.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $263.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $90.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $91.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | $139.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-10.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-284.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.7M | $-433.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-49.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 79.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 83.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 81.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 81.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 79.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 82.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 84.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 85.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.0% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -31.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -69.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -36.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.4% | -90.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -6.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 47.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | 74.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -126.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | -169.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -18.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.78 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.91 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | $4.50 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.39 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-9.39 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $-14.35 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.71 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $92.4M | $226.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $-171.5M |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $226.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $184.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.4M | $267.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $138.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $146.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $159.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.3M | $236.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $190.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-171.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-260.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $-351.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-496.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-488.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-497.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $999.2M | $-218.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $228.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.0B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.3M | $26.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.18× | 0.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $26.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-60.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $-25.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $184.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $19.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | $111.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $135.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | -0.18× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BORR
| Transferred Over Time | $256.6M | 96% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $11.1M | 4% |
RILY
| Transferred At Point In Time | $101.4M | 54% |
| Wealth Management Segment | $30.7M | 16% |
| Corporate Finance Consulting And Investment Banking Fees | $27.1M | 14% |
| Services And Fees | $24.8M | 13% |
| Commissions Fees And Reimbursed Expenses | $4.8M | 3% |
