vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Borr Drilling Ltd (BORR) and Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Borr Drilling Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($267.7M vs $213.6M, roughly 1.3× Vital Farms, Inc.). Borr Drilling Ltd runs the higher net margin — 13.1% vs 7.6%, a 5.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vital Farms, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.7% vs -1.5%).
Borr Drilling Ltd is a global offshore drilling contractor owning and operating a modern fleet of high-spec jack-up rigs. It offers drilling services to oil and gas exploration and production firms, with main operations across the North Sea, Southeast Asia, Middle East, and West Africa for shallow-water and marginal field projects.
Vital Tomosi Dairy Limited is a dairy processing company in Uganda. The company is a joint venture between Vital Capital Fund, "an impact investing fund primarily focused on Sub-Saharan Africa", and "Tomosi Dairy Farms, a Ugandan producer of dairy products".
BORR vs VITL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $267.7M | $213.6M |
| Net Profit | $35.1M | $16.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.8% |
| Operating Margin | 36.0% | 10.0% |
| Net Margin | 13.1% | 7.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.5% | 28.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.7% | 54.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.14 | $0.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $213.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $198.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $267.7M | $184.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $162.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $166.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $145.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $271.9M | $147.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $147.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $16.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | $16.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.7M | $16.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $19.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 35.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 38.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 38.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 39.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.0% | 12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.4% | 11.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 16.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | $0.36 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.37 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.16 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $0.36 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.43 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $92.4M | $48.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $351.3M |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $518.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $48.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $93.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.4M | $108.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $156.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $150.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $149.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.3M | $133.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $113.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $351.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $331.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $309.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $288.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $269.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $253.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $999.2M | $238.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $213.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $518.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $481.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $430.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $376.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $359.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $344.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $320.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $300.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.3M | $5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-32.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -15.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 17.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.18× | 0.35× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-48.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $23.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $-761.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | $16.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $23.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-32.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-10.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-7.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $22.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | -15.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 15.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | -0.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.31× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | 0.99× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.26× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BORR
| Transferred Over Time | $256.6M | 96% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $11.1M | 4% |
VITL
| Eggs And Egg Related Products | $205.8M | 96% |
| Butter And Butter Related Products | $7.7M | 4% |
