vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BOS BETTER ONLINE SOLUTIONS LTD (BOSC) and Namib Minerals (NAMM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Namib Minerals is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($41.9M vs $26.6M, roughly 1.6× BOS BETTER ONLINE SOLUTIONS LTD). Namib Minerals produced more free cash flow last quarter ($7.4M vs $1.2M).
B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. is a publicly traded company, headquartered in Israel, that provides RFID and supply chain solutions. Its shares are traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market.
Namib Minerals is a Namibia-based natural resources firm focused on exploration, development and extraction of high-demand mineral deposits including uranium, copper and lithium. It operates across licensed southern African sites, supplying raw materials to global clean energy, construction and electronics manufacturing sectors.
BOSC vs NAMM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.6M | $41.9M |
| Net Profit | $2.1M | — |
| Gross Margin | 23.4% | 45.7% |
| Operating Margin | 6.8% | 29.8% |
| Net Margin | 8.0% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 34.6% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 70.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | $26.6M | $41.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.7M | — |
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | — |
| Q2 25 | 23.4% | 45.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.1% | — |
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 29.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | — |
| Q2 25 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | — |
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.21 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $24.2M | — |
| Total Assets | $38.4M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $5.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | — |
| Q2 25 | $24.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.1M | — |
| Q2 25 | $38.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.8M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.5M | $11.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.2M | $7.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.5% | 17.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.0% | 9.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.69× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $1.5M | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $320.0K | — |
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $7.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.0K | — |
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 17.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | — |
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | — |
| Q2 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.26× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
