vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Property Partners L.P. (BPYPP) and Digital Realty (DLR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Property Partners L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.6B, roughly 1.1× Digital Realty). Digital Realty runs the higher net margin — 6.0% vs -2.6%, a 8.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Digital Realty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.1% vs -25.6%).
Brookfield Property Partners L.P. is a limited partnership that owns office buildings and shopping centers/shopping malls, as well as minority limited partner interests in investment funds sponsored by affiliates that invest in other types of commercial property. It is headquartered in Hamilton, Bermuda.
Digital Realty is a real estate investment trust that owns, operates and invests in carrier-neutral data centers across the world. The company offers data center, colocation, and interconnection services.
BPYPP vs DLR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $1.6B |
| Net Profit | $-46.0M | $98.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 6.9% |
| Net Margin | -2.6% | 6.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -25.6% | 16.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 94.2% | -10.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $98.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $98.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $67.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-46.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $110.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $189.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-789.0M | $80.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.6% | 69.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -32.6% | 5.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.7B | $3.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $40.2B | $22.9B |
| Total Assets | $98.9B | $49.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $22.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $22.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $23.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.2B | $22.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $21.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $21.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $21.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.5B | $20.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $49.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $49.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $48.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.9B | $48.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $45.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $45.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $45.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $132.6B | $43.6B |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
