vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) and Extra Space Storage (EXR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Broadridge Financial Solutions is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7B vs $856.0M, roughly 2.0× Extra Space Storage). Extra Space Storage runs the higher net margin — 28.2% vs 16.6%, a 11.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Extra Space Storage posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.4% vs -5.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Broadridge Financial Solutions's revenue compounded faster (10.4% CAGR vs 2.8%).
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. is a public corporate services and financial technology company. Headquartered in Lake Success, New York, the company was founded in 2007 as a spin-off from Automatic Data Processing. Broadridge supplies companies in the financial industry with financial documents such as proxy statements and annual reports, as well as shareholder communications solutions such as virtual annual meetings.
Extra Space Storage Inc. is an American real estate investment trust headquartered in Cottonwood Heights, Utah that invests in self storage facilities. The company rents storage units, including climate controlled units, drive-up units, lockers, boat storage, RV storage and business storage under the brands Extra Space Storage, Life Storage, and Storage Express. As of March 28, 2024 the company owned and/or operated 3,714 locations in 43 states, and Washington, D.C. comprising approximately 2.
BR vs EXR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7B | $856.0M |
| Net Profit | $284.6M | $241.0M |
| Gross Margin | 27.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 12.0% | 42.9% |
| Net Margin | 16.6% | 28.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.4% | 4.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 17.1% | -11.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.42 | $1.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $856.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $857.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $858.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $841.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $820.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $821.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $824.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $810.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $241.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $284.6M | $287.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $166.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $374.2M | $249.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $243.1M | $270.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $142.4M | $262.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.8M | $193.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $323.2M | $185.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.6% | 73.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 72.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.3% | 73.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.8% | 72.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.9% | 73.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.5% | 74.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.5% | 75.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 42.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.0% | 43.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 32.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.1% | 44.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.0% | 47.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.3% | 46.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 36.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.7% | 37.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 28.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.6% | 33.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.1% | 29.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.4% | 33.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.0% | 31.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | 23.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.6% | 22.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.14 | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.42 | $1.35 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.17 | $1.18 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.05 | $1.28 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.20 | $1.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.68 | $0.91 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.72 | $0.88 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $371.5M | $139.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.9B | — |
| Total Assets | $8.6B | $29.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.10× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $139.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $371.5M | $138.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $111.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $562.2M | $125.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $317.9M | $119.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $290.6M | $138.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $293.5M | $88.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $305.2M | $77.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $13.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $13.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $13.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $13.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $13.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $14.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $14.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $29.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.6B | $29.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $29.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.5B | $29.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3B | $29.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.2B | $28.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.0B | $28.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.2B | $27.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.10× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.22× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.64× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.63× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.55× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BR
| Recurring Fee Revenue Investor Communication Solutions | $589.5M | 34% |
| Recurring Fee Revenue Capital Markets | $300.9M | 18% |
| Recurring Fee Revenue Regulatory | $248.7M | 15% |
| Recurring Fee Revenue Customer Communications | $189.2M | 11% |
| Recurring Fee Revenue Wealth And Investment Management | $179.7M | 10% |
| Recurring Fee Revenue Data Driven Fund Solutions | $112.7M | 7% |
| Event Driven Revenue Mutual Funds | $51.4M | 3% |
| Event Driven Revenue Equity And Other | $39.2M | 2% |
| Global Technology And Operations | $7.5M | 0% |
EXR
| Property rental | $733.2M | 86% |
| Tenant reinsurance | $89.1M | 10% |
| Management fees and other income | $33.7M | 4% |
