vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Black Rock Coffee Bar, Inc. (BRCB) and HARTE HANKS INC (HHS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Black Rock Coffee Bar, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($51.5M vs $39.9M, roughly 1.3× HARTE HANKS INC). HARTE HANKS INC runs the higher net margin — 5.5% vs -1.4%, a 6.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. HARTE HANKS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-686.0K vs $-25.8M).
Black Rock Coffee Bar, Inc. is a U.S.-based specialty coffee retail chain that offers handcrafted premium coffee beverages, energy drinks, baked goods, and light snacks. It operates in-store and drive-thru locations primarily across western U.S. states, prioritizing high-quality customizable products and community-focused consumer experiences.
Harte Hanks is a global marketing services company headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts. Harte Hanks services include analytics, strategy, marketing technology, creative services, digital marketing, customer care, direct mail, logistics, and fulfillment.
BRCB vs HHS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $51.5M | $39.9M |
| Net Profit | $-712.0K | $2.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -12.4% | -0.3% |
| Net Margin | -1.4% | 5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -15.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.05 | $0.30 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $39.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.5M | $39.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $38.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $41.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $47.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $47.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $45.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $45.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-712.0K | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-335.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-392.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $142.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-27.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-171.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.4% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.4% | -5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -61.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.05 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.31 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.84 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $32.6M | $5.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $20.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $43.0M | $20.5M |
| Total Assets | $323.2M | $91.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.46× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.6M | $6.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $20.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.0M | $19.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $22.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $21.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $21.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $21.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $20.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $20.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $91.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $323.2M | $92.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $95.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $100.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $101.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $108.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $109.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $113.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.9M | $737.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-25.8M | $-686.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -50.2% | -1.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 44.5% | 3.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-4.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $737.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.9M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-818.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-5.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-686.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-25.8M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-923.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $926.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-6.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -50.2% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -13.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -20.76× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BRCB
Segment breakdown not available.
HHS
| Fulfillment And Logistics Services | $17.3M | 43% |
| Customer Care | $13.7M | 34% |
| Other | $8.9M | 22% |
