vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Borealis Foods Inc. (BRLS) and Simply Good Foods Co (SMPL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Simply Good Foods Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($340.2M vs $7.1M, roughly 47.9× Borealis Foods Inc.). Simply Good Foods Co runs the higher net margin — 7.4% vs -53.2%, a 60.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Simply Good Foods Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.3% vs -12.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Simply Good Foods Co's revenue compounded faster (5.0% CAGR vs -2.4%).
Borealis Foods Inc is a food technology enterprise specializing in developing and producing high-quality plant-based protein products including plant-based meat alternatives. It mainly serves retail and food service customers across North America and Europe, focusing on delivering affordable, nutritious sustainable food options matching the taste of conventional animal-derived meat.
Whole Foods Market, Inc. is an American multinational supermarket chain headquartered in Austin, Texas, owned wholly by Amazon, and which generally sells whole food products free from hydrogenated fats and artificial colors, flavors, and preservatives. A USDA Certified Organic grocer in the United States, the chain is popularly known for its organic selections.
BRLS vs SMPL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2025 vs Q1 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.1M | $340.2M |
| Net Profit | $-3.8M | $25.3M |
| Gross Margin | 14.6% | 32.3% |
| Operating Margin | -27.1% | 11.0% |
| Net Margin | -53.2% | 7.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -12.0% | -0.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 21.8% | -33.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.18 | $0.26 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $340.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2M | $381.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8M | $341.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1M | $375.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5M | $334.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.9M | $312.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $25.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.6M | $41.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.8M | $38.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.8M | $29.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.3M | $41.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.4M | $33.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 36.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 38.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.8% | 38.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.7% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.1% | 37.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -46.7% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -42.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -68.4% | 16.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -44.8% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -94.8% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -88.3% | 15.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -53.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -64.0% | 10.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -61.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -85.3% | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -59.8% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -115.0% | 12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -106.8% | 10.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.18 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.21 | $0.40 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.82 | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.23 | $0.29 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.29 | $0.41 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.49 | $0.33 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $194.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-12.9M | $1.7B |
| Total Assets | $56.3M | $2.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $194.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $98.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $121.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $132.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $208.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $135.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $397.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $237.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $237.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.2M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-695.9K | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.1M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.2M | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.3M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.0M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.9M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $70.3M | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.14× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-190.6K | $50.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $48.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 14.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.98× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $50.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-190.6K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-819.4K | $32.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.3M | $48.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.2M | $72.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.8M | $46.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $48.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-951.6K | $31.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.7M | $45.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.7M | $72.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.3M | $46.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -20.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -14.1% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -46.1% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -86.7% | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -92.7% | 14.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.0% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.98× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.84× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.76× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.40× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BRLS
Segment breakdown not available.
SMPL
| Quest | $211.4M | 62% |
| Atkins Domain | $79.7M | 23% |
| OWYN | $28.1M | 8% |
| Other | $20.9M | 6% |
