vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Borealis Foods Inc. (BRLS) and TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC (TACT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($11.5M vs $7.1M, roughly 1.6× Borealis Foods Inc.). On growth, TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.9% vs -12.0%). Over the past eight quarters, TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (3.5% CAGR vs -2.4%).
Borealis Foods Inc is a food technology enterprise specializing in developing and producing high-quality plant-based protein products including plant-based meat alternatives. It mainly serves retail and food service customers across North America and Europe, focusing on delivering affordable, nutritious sustainable food options matching the taste of conventional animal-derived meat.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
BRLS vs TACT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.1M | $11.5M |
| Net Profit | $-3.8M | — |
| Gross Margin | 14.6% | 47.6% |
| Operating Margin | -27.1% | -10.1% |
| Net Margin | -53.2% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -12.0% | 11.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 21.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.18 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1M | $13.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8M | $13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1M | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5M | $11.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.9M | $10.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.8M | $15.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.6M | $-143.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.2M | $19.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.8M | $-551.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.3M | $-319.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.4M | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 47.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.6% | 49.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 48.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.1% | 48.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 44.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.8% | 48.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.7% | 52.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.1% | 52.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -46.7% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -42.6% | -0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -68.4% | -10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -44.8% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -94.8% | -3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -88.3% | -12.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -53.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -64.0% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -61.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -85.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -59.8% | -5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -115.0% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -106.8% | -9.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.18 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.21 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.82 | $-0.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.23 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.29 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.49 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $20.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-12.9M | $31.1M |
| Total Assets | $56.3M | $44.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $17.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.9M | $31.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.2M | $31.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.8M | $30.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-695.9K | $30.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.1M | $38.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9M | $38.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.2M | $38.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $44.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.3M | $45.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.3M | $44.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.4M | $44.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.0M | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.9M | $50.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | $50.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $70.3M | $51.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-190.6K | $609.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $589.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 5.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $7.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $609.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-190.6K | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.4M | $-161.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-819.4K | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.3M | $327.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.2M | $636.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.8M | $-1.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $589.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.4M | $-171.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-951.6K | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.7M | $259.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.7M | $499.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.3M | $-1.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -20.3% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -14.1% | 23.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -46.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -86.7% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -92.7% | -14.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.0% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 242.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -8.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
